fusion_power
Advanced Member
Just a simple and good Volume wheel instead of a tiny, crappy 6mm travel slider-thing?foft said:Anyone got any good ideas? Unlike these...
Mark
Last edited by a moderator:
Just a simple and good Volume wheel instead of a tiny, crappy 6mm travel slider-thing?foft said:Anyone got any good ideas? Unlike these...
Mark
fusion_power said:Just a simple and good Volume wheel instead of a tiny, crappy 6mm travel slider-thing?foft said:Anyone got any good ideas? Unlike these...
Mark
I think the reason they aren't using the volume wheel is because the mechanism would take up too much space.
But wouldn't using a smaller than average volume wheel solve that problem?
-God Ginrai
Humm....the trimpot idea isn't too crazy, A suitably sized trimpot could probably be found. The idea will probably be shot down though because it would take more 'effort' to change the volume (i.e when using the pandora as an mp3 player in your pocket)foft said:Wow, these a really hard to find. But 6mm travel seems low. I'd even prefer a set of 8 external dip switches, giving 256 volume levels Or a trimpot that I need a screwdriver to adjust (stylus could have a screwdriver end?). Or the stylus is volume control (turns an internal trimpot) when in case!
Anyone got any good ideas? Unlike these...
Mark
...Geuben said:Humm....the trimpot idea isn't too crazy
Well, as long we have no pix of the finished PCB and the finished Case (inside) with exact measurements we can just digg in the dark.God Ginrai said:I think the reason they aren't using the volume wheel is because the mechanism would take up too much space.
But wouldn't using a smaller than average volume wheel solve that problem?
-God Ginrai
I think that would act a switch and only a switch, so the changing of the volume would be delt with in software, which is wat everyone was against.Karel Jansens said:How about a "clickwheel", like I had on the Treo 270. It looks like a wheel, but doesn't actually turn; instead it rocks up and down, every rock being a volume click up or down.
I never opened my Treo myself, but from pr0n pics of bare-all Treos, it didn't appear to be a physically large mechanism.
God Ginrai said:fusion_power said:Just a simple and good Volume wheel instead of a tiny, crappy 6mm travel slider-thing?foft said:Anyone got any good ideas? Unlike these...
Mark
I think the reason they aren't using the volume wheel is because the mechanism would take up too much space.
But wouldn't using a smaller than average volume wheel solve that problem?
-God Ginrai
But then we would need to source the small volume wheel, right back where we started.
nubie said:God Ginrai said:fusion_power said:Just a simple and good Volume wheel instead of a tiny, crappy 6mm travel slider-thing?foft said:Anyone got any good ideas? Unlike these...
Mark
I think the reason they aren't using the volume wheel is because the mechanism would take up too much space.
But wouldn't using a smaller than average volume wheel solve that problem?
-God Ginrai
But then we would need to source the small volume wheel, right back where we started.
I realize that, but if they would go for that, then that's a larger range of acceptable things we can search for.
-God Ginrai
Geuben said:If a suitable part cant be found, what is going to be done? I know lots of people were against having software controlled volume, but couldn't it be done propler and implemented into the firmware (so we don't have to rely on dev's to implement it properly in thier own software)?
I kinda prefer a digital control. (particularly a digital wheel) Not going to get all crackly with age or anything. But yes you would need to find a way to make sure it ALWAYS works. Completely lock off access to those buttons to the user and embed it into the kernel or something. GP2x's volume was a nightmare.
Zarneth said:Yeah i think the problems with the gp2x is the reason why so many people wanted physical control over the volume rather than leave it to software, i dont want to take the thread off topic though so back to finding a slider, wheel or come up with a new solution.Geuben said:If a suitable part cant be found, what is going to be done? I know lots of people were against having software controlled volume, but couldn't it be done propler and implemented into the firmware (so we don't have to rely on dev's to implement it properly in thier own software)?
I kinda prefer a digital control. (particularly a digital wheel) Not going to get all crackly with age or anything. But yes you would need to find a way to make sure it ALWAYS works. Completely lock off access to those buttons to the user and embed it into the kernel or something. GP2x's volume was a nightmare.
Not really a solution for those of us that would like to use the built-in speakers. :rolleyes:Gruso said:[Picture of headphone volume adaptor]
How about a hybrid physical solution? a switch along with the 6mm slider, the switch can switch in/out a series resistance to allow for greater control of the volume.Tobriand said:TBH, the 6mm one may be the way to go. I mean, 6mm isn't much - but as long as there is *some* physical control over volume, I don't mind fine-tuning in software. As long as the software is a master setting rather than a program on program basis...
I'd have to agree with you though.Tobriand said:TBH, the 6mm one may be the way to go. I mean, 6mm isn't much - but as long as there is *some* physical control over volume, I don't mind fine-tuning in software. As long as the software is a master setting rather than a program on program basis...
Geuben said:How about a hybrid physical solution? a switch along with the 6mm slider, the switch can switch in/out a series resistance to allow for greater control of the volume.Tobriand said:TBH, the 6mm one may be the way to go. I mean, 6mm isn't much - but as long as there is *some* physical control over volume, I don't mind fine-tuning in software. As long as the software is a master setting rather than a program on program basis...
e.g. High/Low with the switch and a variance of each with the slider
Just a though, although the switch and the slider will probably be bigger than the space we have.
I think I get what you're saying, so for example (excuse the crude ASCII diagrams):
| [] | ------------- |_{}_|
^Volume Slider ------ ^switch
(the '-'s are just used to space the two things apart)
So if the Switch is set to low, you get volumes 0-12 per say, if it is set to medium, you get 13-25, and if it is set to high, you get 26-38.
If that's what you are saying, I have NO problem with that, and that could actually make volume setting really nice, because you could easily switch from soft to loud with just 2 clicks of a switch. It could possibly even have a 4th setting that worked as a mute, effectively cutting power to the speakers, saving battery life!
If we can't find the type of slider Craig wants and we can't do a wheel, I'd suggest this method, it seems very practical.
-God Ginrai