Those games where very good for their time. But I think:
1. You shouldn't make much sequals for a fighting game. Like someone who was good in KoF 95, still is in KoF2002 cause the gameplay doesn't change exept for a few things. Some people like that, but much don't I think. Like I prefer KoF2002 (cause of the 60+ characters) and much others prefer KoF 95 because it was very good back then.
2. Games like the Ridge Racer series needed to add more and more to make the game better. Like Ridge Racer 1 on PSX had 4 cars or something, 5 tracks and NO SAVE option and still this game was good back then. But Ridge Racer changed so much every version. And that's good, cause I think Ridge Racer 7 will be a great game.
3. Then you have one game in particulair, Metal Gear Solid (PSX). The first game was so great and everybody wanted to buy MGS:2 (PS2), and my opinion is: THAT GAME SUCKED ASS and still Konami or whatever company creats the MGS keep creating Metal Gear games which still SUCK!
4. Then you have Mario;
Super Mario Bros. (NES) - Good!
Super Mario Bros.2 (NES) - Better!
Super Mario Bros.3 (NES) - Everybody knows all the secrets in this game and can remember every tune in this game
Super Mario World 64 (N64) - Revolutionary
Mario Sunshine (NGC) - The biggest crap Nintendo every created!
This way I can name hundreds of games which previous versions were the ones we all know and the sequals will be forgotten. Almost everybody knows: mario, little nemo, marble madness, ducktales, loderunner, bomberman, kirby (just to name a couple of nintendo games) Then you have pacman, space invaders, defender etc. etc. Like... have you ever played Pacworld 3D, (even IF you did), you know that every pac-man game ever created after the original contains the classic. <_<
Since the PS2, XBOX, NGC console war something happened to the game world which I don't like. So I bought a GP2X for playing my good ol' classics :rolleyes:
Well, that's my longest post i've written so far :lol: