Strategic voting ruins results and may in some cases result in the will of the late majority be swayed by the early minority. Consider a vote with three options: A, B and C. The first 100 voters vote A(10), B(40), C(50). The next 200 would vote A(100), B(50), C(50) IF they could not see the current results. Now that they do, one by one the A voters choose to vote B or C because they don't want the closest competitor to win. In total, they vote A(40), B(90), C(70) The actual will of the voters is A(110), B(90), C(100), but the actual result ends up being A(50), B(130), C(120). Notice how the order is actually reversed from ACB to BCA.
I hope nr. 4 wins but it seems that a slight majority prefers logo 2. However, in the german thread logo 4 is fav.http://forum.gp2x.de/viewtopic.php?f=89&t=16656115 vs 116 votes.
Makes decision really easy.
It keeps going back and forth, honestly. I've seen #4 ahead of #2 a couple of times now.I hope nr. 4 wins but it seems that a slight majority prefers logo 2. However, in the german thread logo 4 is fav.http://forum.gp2x.de/viewtopic.php?f=89&t=16656115 vs 116 votes.
Makes decision really easy.
Small community there I know but maybe a MIX of Logo 2 and 4 could be used somehow? Our gfx gurus may design something in between just to see how it woul look.
Of course. I did the same.
I switched from 1 to 2 because I dislike #4 hahaha... The funny thing is I think I might have been partially responsible for the concept that sprouted designs leading to #4's creation as well.
You see things I don't see. What does this "Volcom diamond" have to do with logo #4? I don't see the link at all. It looks a tiny bit like logo #2, but nothing to be worried about.not moreso than prior art of idea 4. Or if you will brotherhood of nod vs idea 2
If you want to draw inspiration from existing logos, be it just the idea, it cant look vastly different.
Similarly any simple idea has a root somewhere, in that someone has probably simply already done it.
Logo 4 is a direct copy of such an idea, while i think that is immoral im moreso worried about
Which is owned by kering, not a small company, but a conglomerate which trades in the order of billions of dollars yearly.
Also owns gucci, and im pretty sure they have trademark-lawyers on staff that are paid enough to make the whole pyra project pale in comparison.
Edit: "According to the complaint, Volcom has spent more than $100,000,000 in marketing their jewel-shaped logo. (since 1991)
Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/life-style/fashion/volcom-sues-jay-z-company-roc-nation-trademark-infringement-diamond-logo-article-1.119339#ixzz2xnRsxcu4 "
"The Volcom lawsuit does not specify damages, but it does request that all Roc Nation products using the logo be destroyed and the company stop using the logo."
Settled out of court, and roc nation no longer uses that logo.
Jay Z has a shitty lawyer. The only thing similar between those 2 logos is the silhouette, which is a basic shape. If he couldn't defend that, then he doesn't deserve the money Jay Z is paying him.Settled out of court, and roc nation no longer uses that logo.
That is the most badass firefighter logo ever.