daclassicgamingmaster
It Is Your Birthday.
actually, ive read 2 magazines which state that the revolution will look practically the same as a GC.
So, are you picking/liking 360 because you don't like the other two? I don't know if deductive thinking works when it comes to deciding what to buy. BTW I found that Gantz at GamingAge Forum has the same avatar as you... :huh:Angel posted on May 23 2006 at 09:58 AM said:Wii, i'm not interested anymore, I saw enough of it on TV to not want it at all. PS3, no thanks, I know its not the most expensive system released, but I really don't see the PS3 making an impact, infact, i personally feel it's a mistake. If i'm going to buy any next gen console, it will be a 360. That is more geared to my liking.
yeah, which magazines were they?daclassicgamingmaster posted on May 23 2006 at 05:43 PM said:actually, ive read 2 magazines which state that the revolution will look practically the same as a GC.
Oh, ok. So the "wii is the best" because Sony "copies everything". Aren't you intelligentnomme posted on May 23 2006 at 04:37 PM said:all i can say is that the wii is the best just seeing the control is amazing cos playstaition copy everything, there the least original and they steal everything. the D-pad, a console hard dive, internet, the light gun, the dog (there psp version of nintendogs), the handheld and every thing it makes it's still gonna be expensive, wat are they gonna steal next? touch screen, one handed controller maybe even the c-stick cos all their controllers are exactlly the same just longer things for handretsts thats all theyv'e done over the last like 12 years.
er, no. Game Informer and IGN ;declaration posted on May 23 2006 at 05:02 PM said:yeah, which magazines were they?daclassicgamingmaster posted on May 23 2006 at 05:43 PM said:actually, ive read 2 magazines which state that the revolution will look practically the same as a GC.
Official Playstation Magazine and Official Xbox Magazine by any chance?
seriously though, the Wii will look better than the GC. Its got more power, why would it not especially as it doesnt do HD? Don't judge graphics by what you've seen so far. I've seen reviews where it says that some 360 games (kong for example) look the same on a normal TV as their current gen counterpart. I don't think what I originally about the Wii and normal TVs is that ridiculous.
Looking at the HI-DEF videos of Mario Galaxy, the graphics are obviously much better. The backgrounds of Smash Bros. are also really impressive. In particular, it does a wipe transition that moves from Mario, Link etc. as they were in SSBM to how they look on the Wii, and the texture quality and model detail has improved by the expected 2-3 times at least. In short, it's a neat upgrade for those of us who don't care about graphics enough to write the Wii off.declaration posted on May 23 2006 at 10:02 PM said:yeah, which magazines were they?daclassicgamingmaster posted on May 23 2006 at 05:43 PM said:actually, ive read 2 magazines which state that the revolution will look practically the same as a GC.
Official Playstation Magazine and Official Xbox Magazine by any chance?
seriously though, the Wii will look better than the GC. Its got more power, why would it not especially as it doesnt do HD? Don't judge graphics by what you've seen so far. I've seen reviews where it says that some 360 games (kong for example) look the same on a normal TV as their current gen counterpart. I don't think what I originally about the Wii and normal TVs is that ridiculous.
jmetal88 posted on May 25 2006 at 01:32 AM said:Finding out that Nintendo chose Wii as the name for their new console just reminds me of when someone posted "GP Enis" as a suggested new name for the GP2X (well, GPX2 at the time).
The Nintendo Wii will compete directly with its current-gen rivals, including on graphics.Like grahf said, the demos at E3 were being played on modified GameCube hardware (just as X360 wasn't played on actual hardware last year--actually on Apple G4s, I believe), so it's not surprising that they're similar in appearance to the GC. Graphics are sure to improve over time (beyond the GC's capability), but one has to realize that this isn't going to be an enormous technical leap from GC to Wii. It will be more powerful but nowhere near the 8x or 32x more powerful that the X360 and PS3 boast.
You'd be surprised what can be done in 480p (<-- what the Wii is capable of. "Hi-Def" starts at 720p/i). Without a hardware necessity to render graphics into an HDTV signal, there isn't a need for processing power comparable, in raw numbers, as the PS3 or X360. However, the quality of the graphics, though rendered smaller, is very likely to equal that which the PS3 and X360 offer.With Wii not supporting Hi-Def (only 480p or whatever), the graphics could only have gotten so much better anyway.