spaceballs3000 said:
craigix said:
It has been sitting being neglected because of the Pandora, so the actual situation is the other way around. They can co exist!
Curious, if you haven't taken pre-orders yet for the IControlPad, why not shelf it for the time being and just worry about the existing pre-paid orders of Pandoras? I guess it be one thing if Pandora building was so slow that you guys have cycles to work on this project instead.
Simple: The only thing that's slowing the Pandora down is not the assembly, but the nubs that need to be redone (or tested) and the board production.
The only thing the ICP shares are the nubs - the boards (AFAIK) as well as the case (this I know for sure) are done by different companies than for the Pandora.
The nub company spits out 14.000 nubs within a few days when MP has started, so this won't delay the Pandora.
Board and case production also won't delay the Pandora.
So it totally makes sense: While the nub company sorts out the nubs and the board company tries to increase speed and quality, why shouldn't Craig use the time to continue to work on the ICP?
Should he sit around all day, waiting for the next boards to arrive, doing nothing?
Also, don't forget: Sales of the ICP could also help speed up Pandora production.
And yeah, while the Pandora is being produced, we also need to pay our bills somehow
WizardStan said:
Actually, there is one thing that I'm curious about that kind of ties it back to the Pandora.
What plastics company did you go with in creating the mould? And did they give you the same kind of headaches as the one used for the Pandora?
AFAIK it was one in UK, and they didn't give any headaches. But the (compared to the Pandora) rather simple case did cost twice as much as the Pandora one.
The Pandora case would've been way more expensive. Maybe for Pandora 2 in a few years, if all works out nicely...?