vcoleiro1
Hardcore Member
- Joined
- Jan 23, 2011
- Messages
- 4,685
I'm afraid you have not read the post where ED said he would be ok with sending Craig refund cash in lew of using that money from purchases to build a Pandora to be sent to Craig. Please read prior posts before commenting in future ie read post 141 in this threadI got the distinct impression that Craig's refund queue isn't restricted to cancelled pre-orders. I also got the impression that there are also more pre-orders than ED had accounted for.
Any plan that involves making ED responsible for the debts of OP Ltd, rather than OP Ltd generating an income of its own is only going to end in trouble later.
I also haven't seen any indication that either ED or Craig would be willing to execute this plan so please stop saying "Lets make it happen" There's nothing any of us (other than ED or Craig themselves) can do to make it happen, so it's rather pointless.
As for whether anyone would buy from Craig again, sure they would. One thing he *is* good at is sales, if he's motivated to do so. Look at the iCP2 kickstarter, he had no trouble getting supporters for it. He *could* still get back on track if he really wanted to,
- Neelix
In regards to refunds, they can only happen via a canceled order, do you know of other situations where this can occur?
I'm not saying ED is responsible for Craig's debt's , just that the current agreement should be adjusted to equally fulfill refunds for the pre-orders etc that have now shifted into refunds .
If it turns out that Craigs lists are bigger than what they should be at this point in time given the 800 starting point when the agreement was made. Then ED certainly has the right to refuse going any further with it. We won't know that until the lists are provided by Craig.
If you think anyone would purchase a Pandora from Craig again in any meaningful numbers , despite: what everyone has been saying after recent incidents and his comments that he doesn't want anything to do with P1 anymore. Well then Sir, it's pointless arguing with you.
Last edited by a moderator: