Epicenter
Well-Known Member
He says equivalent, so it's presumably not an actual Pentium III. But yes, the P3 and P4 series were enormous power hogs, and the XScale chips are pretty terrible about power consumption too. Plus, at 624 MHz they run like 312 MHz true ARM9s. Not very good design. But I digress .. if it were a P3 at 667 MHz in a handheld, battery life would be measured in minutes, not hours.semyaza posted on Sep 13 2006 at 05:57 AM said:Yes as above. Was about to mention about the spec
With a 1gHz PIII equivalent processor, we felt we really did not need
undocumented video acceleration chips. The proof of concept units
have a 667 mHz processor which decodes MP1/2/4 video fine, MP3's,
and played quite nicely DOS, MAME, native Linux and Windows games.
Not being a hardware expert and just a consumer, I thought intel type chips were power hogs. Battery power in a gp2x is bad but this would be something else????
Last edited by a moderator: