yaustar
UK GP32 & GP2X Owner
Sounds like we might have to steel ourselves against a new influx of users (remembers one of Rico's quotes )
In storadge space yes, but in price...not so big , but damn, if they'll do that I will start to regret that I have bought it couple of weeks ago ><yaustar posted on Apr 18 2006 at 12:11 PM said:64mb -> 512mb? That's a big ass jump..
Doubt it.FluffyPanda posted on Apr 18 2006 at 04:49 PM said:Sounds interesting, I've only got 3 concerns.
1) I still haven't found an upgrade compatible sd card... will there be a way to update uboot via USB cable or mounted SD card?
The entire thing is writable, but the firmware part is not visible over USB.FluffyPanda posted on Apr 18 2006 at 04:49 PM said:2) I really hope that they don't get too carried away with the extra nand memory. I'd like to see it partitioned into a 64 meg read-only firmware section and the rest as writable user space.
Well, we will at least get UBoot, kernel and mplayer.FluffyPanda posted on Apr 18 2006 at 04:49 PM said:3) That we get the source to the kernal, mplayer, other gpl components, etc. Menu source would be cool too, though unlikely.
nickspoon posted on Apr 18 2006 at 07:32 PM said:I haven't a clue.
There's also news that GPH are running out of 64MB NANDs in small quantities so will have to move up to 512MB or 1GB, meaning that the read-write NAND and USB NAND access are vital.
nickspoon posted on Apr 18 2006 at 10:42 AM said:The release of the new firmware will be a while yet - they've got problems to fix and they're re-porting mplayer. It'll probably be during May to coincide with the official GP2X release.
Presumably we're going to get more XGP info in May, so maybe the timing has to do with countering that. It's going to take more than a bagful of new features to make the gp2x ready for "the masses" IMO. Most people getting one of these would turn it on and say "um, ok, now what?". If the nand is really increasing so much maybe GPH should contact the authors of the best apps, utilities, emulators, games, etc, and ask permission to include them on the NAND so people buying the gp2x can actually do something with it without doing a ton of research. I know the usual answer to this sort of thing is to say "anybody who buys one of these is a regular on this message board so they know exactly what to do", but I'd like to hope that someday the gp2x will have a larger market potential than that.Paradox posted on Apr 18 2006 at 10:59 AM said:wasnt the "official" release a long time ago?... ive heard that so many times, its just bullshit. its some marketing scam to get posted on news sites..."GP2X OFFICIALLY RELEASED!" then 2 months later... "GP2X OFFICIALY RELEASED TODAY!" more publicity.
im miffed about the increase in nand memory. 1gb is a hell of a lot more than 64mb.
pantera6 posted on Apr 18 2006 at 11:32 AM said:When people talk about an "official release" does that mean that gph are going to try sell the gp2x in game and gamestation?
Vektar :lol:craigix posted on Apr 18 2006 at 11:57 AM said:The Nand is going to contain more apps (suggestions welcome)
Actually, as a pack-in game that would be GREAT...Dzz posted on Apr 18 2006 at 12:59 PM said:Vektar :lol:craigix posted on Apr 18 2006 at 11:57 AM said:The Nand is going to contain more apps (suggestions welcome)
I have no official information but I highly doubt that they would do anything outrageous like that. All a bigger NAND does is give some more storage space on the device. The current amount of space is a lot more than is needed by the operating system itself, so the only thing they could use it for is "applications". Those of us with smaller NAND chips might have to run those apps from SD, but that's not a hardship.Wes Vampire posted on Apr 18 2006 at 12:44 PM said:If it is actually true that they're planning to build in higher capacity NAND chips does that mean that we will not enjoy some stuff in the future (most of us die-hards have the first edition off course), but if that means that we will not be able to enjoy all the fun.... .....