Phlyra
FLOSSing
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2019
- Messages
- 1,517
Sorry to hear thatmy father got out of isolation a week ago and he just tested positive again.
w. t. f.
there are no rules with covid
Sorry to hear thatmy father got out of isolation a week ago and he just tested positive again.
w. t. f.
there are no rules with covid
And do they need such complex research to kill us ? They were killing us alright already with tobacco, palm oil, pollution and social networks. It's their hobby to find ever more misterious ways or what ?
I've heard they're finding it in sewage in Catalonia (meaning it's more widespread than the 2 cases they thought they had insolated in the airport). To be confirmed? Also heard it's been found in people in Europe who didn't come from Africa or anywhere, so now it seems the first place woldn't be Africa. It was never clear, I guess. The point is variants get everywhere before we notice.Omicron just got found in Brazil, putting it on six continents now.
Next stop: Antarctica.
Sorry if I don't get your meaning. We were talking about "they" killing "us". Not they extinguishing the human species. You may not be aware, or be very aware, because of your diet, but there are farms where they kill lots of animals, but they still don't end up empty. Both cattle and people are born, not only die, so looking only at the population does not tell anything about there being kills or not.
I thought that with "killing us alright" you meant "killing us fast enough to reduce the human population". What standard did you have for determining whether they are killing us well enough?Sorry if I don't get your meaning. We were talking about "they" killing "us". Not they extinguishing the human species. You may not be aware, or be very aware, because of your diet, but there are farms where they kill lots of animals, but they still don't end up empty. Both cattle and people are born, not only die, so looking only at the population does not tell anything about there being kills or not.
I was talking tongue-in-cheek, so I'm not sure I had a so precise meaning, but I'll try: I meant there were killing us in clear ways, i.e. there are things that are legal and commonplace that kill, that kill without much doubt that they kill, but are still allowed or even sometimes promoted. The point was that we're accepting deadly things that are not even much disguised, so why would need any "they" try to use something more stealth like defects in Pfizer lots. There's even people out there selling boxes saying "Tobacco kills" in big letters. And people buying the boxes to kill themselves with. So what would the motivation be for such a sophisticated scheme ? I was not refereing to speed or casualities per day.I thought that with "killing us alright" you meant "killing us fast enough to reduce the human population". What standard did you have for determining whether they are killing us well enough?
I guess it all depends on the intelligence one attributes to the killers. They don't even have to want to kill people. Maybe they just want to get more money and they kill people as a side effect. Then they might end up killing the people who has the money.Vaccination data show that people in rich countries were vaccinated first and in most countries, rich people are generally more vaccinated than poor people.
If I expected "the powers that be" to plan to reduce the human population, I'd expect them to do it the other way around.
Why?Vaccination data show that people in rich countries were vaccinated first and in most countries, rich people are generally more vaccinated than poor people.
If I expected "the powers that be" to plan to reduce the human population, I'd expect them to do it the other way around.
Nope, because we are too educated and too expensive so it's logical to be removed first.Vaccination data show that people in rich countries were vaccinated first and in most countries, rich people are generally more vaccinated than poor people.
If I expected "the powers that be" to plan to reduce the human population, I'd expect them to do it the other way around.
Peasants care about acquiring money. The elite cares about making sure that peasants keep caring about acquiring money.I guess it all depends on the intelligence one attributes to the killers. They don't even have to want to kill people. Maybe they just want to get more money and they kill people as a side effect. Then they might end up killing the people who has the money.
Explain how the UKers voted in Boris Johnson for me please.Nope, because we are too educated
I haven’t read the article yet but I’m wondering if “must discuss” is meant as “consult the public for feedback on such a potential measure before deciding whether or not to implement it, rather than simply enforcing the measure without any consultation”?I guess that it's time to fight those criminals:
![]()
EU must consider mandatory Covid jabs, says Von der Leyen
European Commission president says EU states need to discuss idea in response to spread of Omicron variantwww.theguardian.com