COVID-19 / Coronavirus Pandemic

[Phlyra]

my father got out of isolation a week ago and he just tested positive again.

w. t. f.

there are no rules with covid

Sorry to hear that Does that mean he has to isolate again, under the current regulations? How’s he been managing with the isolation?

 

[JDTAY]

Omicron just got found in Brazil, putting it on six continents now.

Next stop: Antarctica.

 

[levi]

Yeah, it's apparently been spreading a good while before it was first identified in SA. Turns out relying on 2-day PCR tests isn't good enough.

 

[λ the β-Redex Reducer]

And do they need such complex research to kill us ? They were killing us alright already with tobacco, palm oil, pollution and social networks. It's their hobby to find ever more misterious ways or what ?

 

[pyrat]

Omicron just got found in Brazil, putting it on six continents now.

Next stop: Antarctica.

I've heard they're finding it in sewage in Catalonia (meaning it's more widespread than the 2 cases they thought they had insolated in the airport). To be confirmed? Also heard it's been found in people in Europe who didn't come from Africa or anywhere, so now it seems the first place woldn't be Africa. It was never clear, I guess. The point is variants get everywhere before we notice.

Post automatically merged: Dec 1, 2021

Sorry if I don't get your meaning. We were talking about "they" killing "us". Not they extinguishing the human species. You may not be aware, or be very aware, because of your diet, but there are farms where they kill lots of animals, but they still don't end up empty. Both cattle and people are born, not only die, so looking only at the population does not tell anything about there being kills or not.

 

[Phlyra]

Soooo we should expect further restrictions on travel, Japan-style

 

[Phlyra]

Bad Science https://www.bmj.com/content/375/bmj.n2635?=

 

[λ the β-Redex Reducer]

Sorry if I don't get your meaning. We were talking about "they" killing "us". Not they extinguishing the human species. You may not be aware, or be very aware, because of your diet, but there are farms where they kill lots of animals, but they still don't end up empty. Both cattle and people are born, not only die, so looking only at the population does not tell anything about there being kills or not.

I thought that with "killing us alright" you meant "killing us fast enough to reduce the human population". What standard did you have for determining whether they are killing us well enough?

 

[pyrat]

I thought that with "killing us alright" you meant "killing us fast enough to reduce the human population". What standard did you have for determining whether they are killing us well enough?

I was talking tongue-in-cheek, so I'm not sure I had a so precise meaning, but I'll try: I meant there were killing us in clear ways, i.e. there are things that are legal and commonplace that kill, that kill without much doubt that they kill, but are still allowed or even sometimes promoted. The point was that we're accepting deadly things that are not even much disguised, so why would need any "they" try to use something more stealth like defects in Pfizer lots. There's even people out there selling boxes saying "Tobacco kills" in big letters. And people buying the boxes to kill themselves with. So what would the motivation be for such a sophisticated scheme ? I was not refereing to speed or casualities per day.
I see I wasn't being clear, sorry.

 

[ElPoco]

Vaccination data show that people in rich countries were vaccinated first and in most countries, rich people are generally more vaccinated than poor people.
If I expected "the powers that be" to plan to reduce the human population, I'd expect them to do it the other way around.

 

[pyrat]

Vaccination data show that people in rich countries were vaccinated first and in most countries, rich people are generally more vaccinated than poor people.
If I expected "the powers that be" to plan to reduce the human population, I'd expect them to do it the other way around.

I guess it all depends on the intelligence one attributes to the killers. They don't even have to want to kill people. Maybe they just want to get more money and they kill people as a side effect. Then they might end up killing the people who has the money.
Or maybe "they" are such a small group that don't appear in statististics and "they" also want to kill the rich, or want to kill the rich first.
But really, aren't we all analysing the thesis with more detail that it's formulated itself ?

 

[λ the β-Redex Reducer]

Vaccination data show that people in rich countries were vaccinated first and in most countries, rich people are generally more vaccinated than poor people.
If I expected "the powers that be" to plan to reduce the human population, I'd expect them to do it the other way around.

Why?

 

[levi]

Because I guess as a sport historically at least, killing africans has been seen as better than killing europeans (at least from the 1700s and on). Although for balance I'd note that in my experience, nobody who's received a vaccine has experienced any side effects at all, and assuming it has an effect on us and isn't placebo, should reduce our chances of dying by viral infection. If that can be extrapolated to the worlds population then I guess the direction of travel is more understandable; protect the europeans, sod the africans.

 

[Linux-SWAT]

Vaccination data show that people in rich countries were vaccinated first and in most countries, rich people are generally more vaccinated than poor people.
If I expected "the powers that be" to plan to reduce the human population, I'd expect them to do it the other way around.

Nope, because we are too educated and too expensive so it's logical to be removed first.
Also the immigrants have zero sense of nationalism so they won't fight against the worldwide dictatorship which is currently emerging all over the planet.
In France, just look at who is controlling the pass.

 

[Linux-SWAT]

I guess that it's time to fight those criminals:

EU must consider mandatory Covid jabs, says Von der Leyen

European Commission president says EU states need to discuss idea in response to spread of Omicron variant

www.theguardian.com

 

[λ the β-Redex Reducer]

I guess it all depends on the intelligence one attributes to the killers. They don't even have to want to kill people. Maybe they just want to get more money and they kill people as a side effect. Then they might end up killing the people who has the money.

Peasants care about acquiring money. The elite cares about making sure that peasants keep caring about acquiring money.

The elite has a monopoly on money creation so they already have practically infinite money. But money is just worthless numbers (whether in a computer, on paper, or on a coin of cheap metal). So the elite has worthless numbers while the peasants have valuable labour. That is why the goal of the elite is to ensure that the peasants will trade in valuable labour for worthless numbers.

 

[levi]

Nope, because we are too educated

Explain how the UKers voted in Boris Johnson for me please.

 

[Linux-SWAT]

In France, elections are phony because every single mass media is controlled by the bankers family.

 

[pyrat]

I'd love to carry on, for instance by asking how do we know the elite is alive anyway, but can we go back a little in topic ?
To post something about COVID-19 here's the news article about Merck's molnupiravir.
(That's the one that costs 15-18€ to make and 700€ to buy, I hope less now)
First essays resulted in those taking the drug having half the hospitalizations than those taking placebo.
Second essay resulted in those taking the drug having a little more hospitalizations than those taking placebo.
Both combined had around 1500 participants.
Approved anyway, voted 13 against 10.

 

[Phlyra]

I guess that it's time to fight those criminals:

EU must consider mandatory Covid jabs, says Von der Leyen

European Commission president says EU states need to discuss idea in response to spread of Omicron variant

www.theguardian.com

I haven’t read the article yet but I’m wondering if “must discuss” is meant as “consult the public for feedback on such a potential measure before deciding whether or not to implement it, rather than simply enforcing the measure without any consultation”?