View attachment 37256
If I strech the Y-axis by 80, I get a not-so-flat curve.
View attachment 37256
If I strech the Y-axis by 80, I get a not-so-flat curve.
Nevertheless, even ignoring the situation he inherited from the previous President, in terms of the vaccine it’s no mean feat to have come as far as the US - or frankly any (admittedly more economically developed) country - has in the space of a year and a half...FiveThirtyEight's Nate Silver says we're going to miss President Biden's goal of having 70% of adults vaccinated by July 4th. That said, he also says a Gallup poll said 76% of adults either plan to get vaccinated or already have done so, so we'll get there eventually.
yetnot general populations.
It's probably suppose to read like this:MSN calls it China disease?
You’ll wonder a little more now; I’m getting rid of your definite articles... (they only make sense in this context if you’re referring to *the Covid-19 disease*, which I take it is not the interpretation you read?)I read it as "China expert who is expert inthedisease says COVID-19..."
or "expert inthedisease who is from China says COVID-19..."
or even "someone who is expert in both China andthedisease, says COVID-19..."
but I guess the only thing preventing me from interpreting it as "China disease" is that I find it nonsensical, not that I couldn't be the intended meaning.
But I'm no "English expert" and I always wonder at how a language with so little inflection manages to get more and more rid of prepositions, specially in headlines and maybe by non native speakers.
Note that it's not the American PEOPLE, but the government (for example: surrounding all countries with their bases and submarines). Just like there are nice CHINESE PEOPLE, and a toxic government (sealing entire blocks off and starving people - you have seen those video clips right?).As an American, I'd like to apologize in advance for when we get busted as the origin of COVID-19.
Well, headlines is an art-form. You need to entice to click/read with just a few words. You may offend, lie or bend the truth, all for the clicks. consider: "Industry turning fish gay" for a derived article based on say thisspecially in headlines
There's a definite difference in interpreting an 'expert in the disease' and an 'expert in disease'. The former is about a specific disease while the latter would tend to refer to some kind of doctor or virologist, or some expert in pathogens and genetic disease and toxicities and all of the other ways people can get sick. But in a headline when you read it you need to infer a lot more hidden context to deduce what they mean, often reading the article itself to find out what it actually meant, in which case the headline has done it's job.You’ll wonder a little more now; I’m getting rid of your definite articles... (they only make sense in this context if you’re referring to *the Covid-19 disease*, which I take it is not the interpretation you read?)
Chinese became 'china' and epidemiologist became a person who is experienced in diseases that go on to to form epidemics, which became 'expert in diseases' which finally rather confusingly became just 'disease'.A senior Chinese epidemiologist said the United States should be the priority