λ the β-Redex Reducer
β-Redex Reducing Member
But it is not how we thrive. Thriving can only be done with basic freedom and human rights.Humans can get used to anything. It’s how we survive.
But it is not how we thrive. Thriving can only be done with basic freedom and human rights.Humans can get used to anything. It’s how we survive.
Are you kidding? If the SHTF you preserve the cat meat and eat it when you need to!We have been not thriving for a long time. Thriving to me at least involves humans being as free and independent as the wild animals are. Not necessarily living primitively; living primitively is not what I mean. For a long time humans have been like domesticated pets in the sense that they would die if released in the wild. Even our cats are less dependent on being taken care of than we are. In that sense we are more like pets than some of our pets are. This is true to the extend that if SHTF then a viable option for people who care about their cats might be to just release their cats so that at least the cats will probably not have to starve with them. Thriving requires being independent of the grid.
To call the epidemic fictitious could be incredibly offensive to anyone here who's lost someone close to them with the disease.
BTW, because you do not answer, I will finish my line of reasoning here by covering all possible answers:During 2016, was there a worldwide flu pandemic going on?
If so, we are woefully unprepared. We do not know of the seasons. When to plant seeds, how to tend the soil; how to rotate so that the soil can rest. We do not know of the wind, all the information it carries. How to smell the rains to come. How to find water. How to find ore and smelt it to make nails and axes.Thriving requires being independent of the grid.
I think there is also a mental self-defense mechanism at play. I mean, I know about the raping of an 11 year old by 50 lightly tinted men in the UK. But Brits don't care, they just go about their business and stuff. When there's something so horrible and getting worse and worse (the link is only statistics) most just shut their eyes to it (sadly, myself included).So pick your poison, do you acknowledge a ludicrous statement as being truthful or are you being a hypocrite?
Ah, but that is YOU having the OLD definition of pandemic, not the NEW definition of pandemic. See? Fixed that for you. Everything is a pandemic now. Common cold? Seasonal pandemic. Natural Herd immunity? Does not exist anymore. Even Mer.Webster/Wikipedia changes their definitions on-the-fly and nobody notices.saying that there is no pandemic
Merriam-Webster apparently changed the definition of "vaccine" too, according to archive.org.Even Mer.Webster/Wikipedia changes their definitions on-the-fly and nobody notices.
This always happens with any language in day-to-day use.it is interesting nonetheless that dictionaries are changing their definitions seemingly because of the current situation
I can only find cow pox in that page in the etymology section, and it's the same in both. The previous definition precludes things like the moderna vaccine from being properly called a vaccine, which doesn't strike me as right, so it's a good thing they modified their definition to also allow this type of vaccine I say.Merriam-Webster apparently changed the definition of "vaccine" too, according to archive.org.
- Old definition
- New definition
The old definition is very old and it's only other change was removing a redundant alternative definition about cow pox specifically.
Agree - we are constantly being reprogrammed.This always happens with any language in day-to-day use.
Ok Mowgli.Thriving requires being independent of the grid.
We are programmed to receive.Agree - we are constantly being reprogrammed
Thanks for the correctionYou cancheck-outpre-order any time you like,