The iReadygo Much phone i5 are too big, and the g2 lacks shoulder buttons and a dpad. I also need something I can fit in my pocket. Any suggestions?I have the Xperia Play and emulation was good on it, withPS games playing well as you'd expect... But it's a bit small screen and no versions of Android beyond gingerbread, think I had a icecream-sandwich skinned version of gingerbread.
Perhaps check the iReadygo Much phones too... The g2 and i5 ...both newer versions of Android, phones too. The i5 being the better in terms of controls.
Both 5" screen if I remember right... Plenty clips on YouTube demonstrating both
It does not have to be a phone, just a pocket sized android device with gaming controls.The complete, all-in-one GAMING cellphone isn't out there yet....
give it maybe 6 months - Samsung (and then Sony) will be on it...
It makes it alot bulkier though right? And a additional question.... how stable is Android gingerbread on the xperia play and is it possible to put Android 4.0 on it and be completly stable?Maybe another Goody for you.
There exist for the Xperia Play much bigger Accu up to 4500 Mah and more.
Then you need only 2 Times in the Week Charging up your Device ^_^
The GCW Zero looks AWESOME. Its like a mini Pandora! However, there is one key factor I need to know, is there a android port for the device? (For Youtube, Netflix, and occasional web browsing) (BTW I have a Nvidia Shield, and its waaay to big for me, plan on selling it soon)it's possible to put official ice cream sandwich beta image on the xperia play, the port done by sony was only half finished and not as stable, there exists on XDA community firmware that fixes the things wrong with the official "partially released" version of ICS. The gingerbread port offers better speed and battery life, and stability, at the expense of slightly lower compatibility in features and applications and games. Emulators are mainly uneffected by either build.
Don't get a JXD S602, the hardware sucks bad. Battery & chipset. The yinlips is better hardware but still not as good as the Xperia Play. If it must be android I'd say get the xperia play with an aftermarket battery 3500-4000mah battery. It increases the thickness by about half, but improves the feel of the device while playing and more than doubles the battery life to 10-12 hours of "real gaming" I truly enjoyed the device in it's time.
here's a review I did a while back
http://boards.openpandora.org/topic/2746-xperia-play-vs-pandora//URL]
Nothing else other than what's been mentioned really has filled that level of pocket emulator in the android market that appears to be the specific niche you're looking for. The JXD S601 varients were decent but the battery and controls kinda sucked as well, just not as bad as the 602's.
I would honestly say get a GCW Zero though, it does everything up until you get to PS1 very well. The PS1 emulator exists but is not optimized for the GCW hardware features and is very rough at best, complete bullshit at worst. If you want 80-90's consoles in an extreme portabability form factor then absolutely get a zero. If PS1 and some N64 is important then get an xperia play. I would say that a PS1 emulator will eventually come to the zero, but I've been saying that for over a year now and it hasn't happened yet. I still think it's coming eventually though.
If you want nintendo DS, PSP, gamecube, N64 with best compatibility and speed the software allows then get a nvidia shield. For me, I take a hit in portability for best speed and comfort with that as my chosen handheld. If you want to play game computers from the 70's-80's and most of what the shield is capable of abite not as fast get a pandora. I'll put money on that the Pyra will get comparable levels of speed to the shield in emulation but actually be able to fit in your pocket and will be good game computer emulation as well if you can wait.
Hope that answers your questions.
Theoretically, could it get a android port?No android, the operating system is like the Pandora minus the desktop environment
Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk
Why would it be unstable, I thought Android could operate without a touchscreen?Well its open source software, and there is technically a MIPS branch of android, and there's Linux source for the GCW hardware... So yes technically yes you could port it. And its powerful enough to run, but there's tons of reasons why it would be unusable.
Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk
It can, and while not ideal, it can function if that was the only thing holding it back. The problem comes with the fact that the processor is MIPS, and not ARM. Superficial apps written in java will run like some web browsers and some music apps, simple games etc. But the problems start to really show when you try to run emulators and the "good" android games and apps. Things like Netflix will not run for example, and without intimate knowledge of how specific apps are written you won't know if it will work or not until the app force closes on ya.Why would it be unstable, I thought Android could operate without a touchscreen?Well its open source software, and there is technically a MIPS branch of android, and there's Linux source for the GCW hardware... So yes technically yes you could port it. And its powerful enough to run, but there's tons of reasons why it would be unusable.
Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk