Shadow of Chaos
Active Member
Ok, i am currently looking at the 360, and i see from xbox-scene.com that it seems to be a little more powerful than the PS3.
This is not what i am worried about, since i think that either one of the consoles will look simular.. or one will be better than the other. The real problem i am having is the disc format, the 360 has support for dual layer DVD's.. 9Gb approx, while the PS3 can hold up to 50GB on its blu-ray disks.. Now, when you look at games like HL2 it only requires 1 single layered dvd disk to hold the whole game, including CS source.. So that means if there was quality as good, or a bit better than that on the 360.. it would have plenty of space left, correct?
I surely cant see game developers for the PS3 filling up every bit of disk space on the blu-ray disks, even pc games dont go over a single DVD that im aware of.. Today anyway.
Can someone here with good knowledge fill me in?
cheers
This is not what i am worried about, since i think that either one of the consoles will look simular.. or one will be better than the other. The real problem i am having is the disc format, the 360 has support for dual layer DVD's.. 9Gb approx, while the PS3 can hold up to 50GB on its blu-ray disks.. Now, when you look at games like HL2 it only requires 1 single layered dvd disk to hold the whole game, including CS source.. So that means if there was quality as good, or a bit better than that on the 360.. it would have plenty of space left, correct?
I surely cant see game developers for the PS3 filling up every bit of disk space on the blu-ray disks, even pc games dont go over a single DVD that im aware of.. Today anyway.
Can someone here with good knowledge fill me in?
cheers