The Wikipedia article is still broadly correct, and every time somebody tries to expand it, the nazipedians come and delete the additions for lack of "proper sources". They continue to insist that forum and dev blog posts are not legitimate sources, even though it is the people creating the device that are making those posts.
I've had the Pandora article on my watch list for months and I haven't noticed this happen.
In fact there are three references in the article
right now that are links to this forum. Another is a link to the blog.Go back to Feb-April and you'll see quite a bit of it. Whole sections have been cut out, put back, and cut out again because some people insist that the information is "unsourced", despite being on the wiki and openpandora.ca.
Well, I'm not going to go over all four hundred or so edits just to prove a point, so I'll concede that I might be missing something important, but the only drastic reduction in file-size that I can notice is
this edit by the lone jerk I mentioned above. (I'm probably being too hard on him calling him a jerk. He also removed allegations that the whole thing was a hoax dreamed up by EvilDragon. And once the citation issue was discussed, he backed off.)
Maybe I
am missing something. I've certainly been wrong in the past. But, in any case it hasn't happened
recently.
QUOTE
It's also been tagged for deletion a couple times and still has a "citations needed" tag.
It was certainly tagged as spam back in December 07, But it was not deleted, and at the time, the article was admittedly pretty pathetic. (Wikipedia gets a
lot of spam, as you might expect. Editors have become naturally very wary of anyone showing up and telling them about the Next Big Thing being produced by an unknown company, with no third-party references at all.)
Small chance if links to dev posts are not good enough... But you could try though
