DavidBowman
Active Member
- Joined
- Feb 11, 2009
- Messages
- 697
His criticisms were indeed reasonable, but his approach was not. Which is again, my original point. You're right, he didn't name it that, but he got criticized himself for the name nonetheless. It's not like he said "No, no, no, we can't name it that." More like "No, no... well okay."'Tom`' said:Actually, RMS is not a lawyer - he has a degree in physics, and never pursued a legal career as far as I can tell. Stallman is a political activist, though, whereas Torvalds does not care as much about political issues, which led to friction between the two of them on the subject of the importance of free software. In any event, they have both written a lot of software.
Also, I think Torvalds had some quite reasonable criticisms both of GNOME and KDE 4. I use KDE 3.5 myself, avoiding the issue.
And Torvalds did not name the OS after himself, someone else named it Linux. His original name was "freax."
Last edited by a moderator: