I was just saying if I were running the show, thats how I would do it. I wasnt saying thats how it actually happened.Where did they say that Ubuntu Touch won't be open-source?
As far as I know, the beta version runs on all the latest Nexus devices…
And you can build it from source.
They just want a physical device with the Ubuntu brand on it.
And it allows them to check the interest for this OS and get some advertising.
And what I'm saying is that if they just release the software wholly for existing devices then they have no revenue stream. So they get a few thousand now and release it as open source for specific phones; what do they do next year? It's just not sustainable. No manufacturer will buy their OS from them: Microsoft is having difficulty getting a large number of companies on board with Windows 8, Ubuntu wouldn't stand a chance. They would have to do the porting themselves and sell directly to consumers who are interested in a Linux phone who own the particular phones they've ported to: a subset of a subset of a niche. It's a tiny market and probably not worth the thousands per year it would generate.If they simply release the source for quick cash now and let others do the porting then they've completely removed all possible revenue, they're back to trying to sell services and their app store, something they may be able to do once their brand has been established but right now they are failing at it.But what I'm saying is, you run a Kickstarter that promises to release the software and port it to various devices.
Android is a success because hardware makers can get it for free, that's why they put it everywhere (phones, tablets, netbooks, TV sticks, consoles, …)!And AFAIK android is FOSS… only softwares and drivers running on it are closed source.Android is only a success because Google made it one. I love it, but if it had stayed completely FOSS it would have sucked balls. I wish there was a way to make something non-free quality, but without even a hint of non-free code. Sadly, I dont think it can be done. I just wish Ubuntu didnt have Amazon Spyware in it.
, so Android is terrible.QEDsuck balls
Yeah, it's not like android doesn't have Google Spyware in it. Or Windows, Microsoft AND prism spyware. (don't get me started on Apple spyware )I just wish Ubuntu didnt have Amazon Spyware in it.
WINE. Also there's no reason to switch completely, you can keep Windows on a different partition and just reboot into it for the occasions where you find something that doesn't work in WINE.I want to switch my desktop to some Linux distro, but I spent about $150 in games. If I switch, very few of those will work on another platform. :,(
Doesn't work too well for games, unfortunately. There was something about OpenGL passthrough that would have made things better provided the game was using OpenGL, but anything that's DirectX is problematic to say the least.On my old linux desktop I ran a winXP vm just for a couple of programs
Use Steam or Desura to buy games, then if the games run on Linux you'll get both the Linux and the windows versions. For every thing else dual boot or use wine. I have a friend that ONLY uses windows for games, he calls his Wintendo partition. I've moved 100% away from windows but then again I only play Mincraft and a few other games so gaming on my PC isn't that important to me anymore. Pretty much now if I can play my emulators and Minecraft on my PC, which Linux does fine, I'm good as far as gaming goes.I want to switch my desktop to some Linux distro, but I spent about $150 in games. If I switch, very few of those will work on another platform. :,(
I might get the new Nexus 7 just for this. I'd like to play with it a little.Indeed I can install the Ubuntu Touch beta on my Asus Transformer right now.
I'm almost positive they would end up with an average cost per unit of even less than what they're aiming for now under that plan. Unless substantially more than half are going to care about colour and engraving (and in my own opinion that's beyond optimistic, most people would simply opt for the "unlimited $675" option, but you may disagree) they'd be very shy of what they want.I think the final lesson that Canonical will need to take away from this is that the average person doesn't care about "best of the best of the best" and the value of it. They have their desired cost and it doesn't matter how many GB of RAM you drop into the thing, you're going to get decreasing returns. You're right that the price needs to be lower, but in order to reach that price point they're going to have to accept that a lot of sacrifices are going to have to be made. What was an awesome phone at an average of $800/phone is going to have a lot fewer bells and whistles at $700/phone.Well in hindsight, this is how It probably should have been tiered something like below:
I agree but if their main goal is market research this is not such a bad approach.That's how most projects I have seen are tiered, they seem to have gone for tiers with no added perks but ascending price, very strange and badly thought out.