imec
Member
What's the difference between XFCE and Gnome? I thought it was supposedly super memory efficient, hmmm...
Ravnos said:quadomatic said:Lurkio said:I don't know if anyone's espoused this yet - Enlightenment, it's supposed to be highly configurable so hopefully everyone can get what they want. :lol:
I thought enlightenment actually needed decent hardware to run PC-wise...not sure trhis would be the wisest use of power/battery life.
No, enlightenment is specifically designed to provide eye candy with minimal hardware requirements. That said, it's also under constant heavy development and in my experience it's unsuitable for day to day use.
DR17, the pre-alpha version, is under heavy development. DR16 is stable and while it doesn't have as much eye-candy as DR17, it works very well and would probably run well performance-wise and function-wise on the Craiginator.
DaveC said:Probably since almost ALL of the top emu coders have left for it. They jumped ship overnight, doesn't take much I guess. I will just keep the GP2X until the Craiginator comes out. I see no point in getting cought up in a handheld like that for me. I can't see playing games with too few buttons in mono on a tiny screen. When the Craiginator is released that silly little thing will be left in the lurch anyway.Alex. said:Why are people starting to recommend that JXD keychain as an alternative to the GP2X?
The GP2X will continue to enjoy a nice life alongside the Craiginator, so don't count it out just yet.
Say what? You're paranoid. A lot of emu coders aren't interested in JXD301. The CPU is actually not that great, or at least GCC must not be generating very high quality code.
DaveC said:Probably since almost ALL of the top emu coders have left for it. They jumped ship overnight, doesn't take much I guess. I will just keep the GP2X until the Craiginator comes out. I see no point in getting cought up in a handheld like that for me. I can't see playing games with too few buttons in mono on a tiny screen. When the Craiginator is released that silly little thing will be left in the lurch anyway.Alex. said:Why are people starting to recommend that JXD keychain as an alternative to the GP2X?
The GP2X will continue to enjoy a nice life alongside the Craiginator, so don't count it out just yet.
Say what? You're paranoid. A lot of emu coders aren't interested in JXD301. The CPU is actually not that great, or at least GCC must not be generating very high quality code.
Nova said:You wanna play ZX spectrum or amiga with a stylus? Cos I don't.coldfis said:Why does the craigenthingy need a physical keyboard if it has a touch screen?
In fact, you could probably emulate fairly usable analogue sticks too?
Too many buttons = clutter.
Not particularly, but I dont want to fumble with a keyboard with tiny keys either.
An on-screen board is far more elegant than a tiny "real" board, it can be easily reconfigured to suit the application (ie Amiga specific/labeled keys in Amiga emulation), it costs a lot less to produce if youre building in a touchscreen anyway, and it makes the final product less ugly/cumbersome.
Neither is a perfect solution, but unless youre going to lug a fullsize Speccy or Amiga keyboard around...
lol, the community, riiight. Look, that GP2X Standards thing is a failure as in nobody in the community gave a fuck about what it said. It had no fucking impact. You can do it again with the Craiginator but still no one will give a fuck about it.PokeParadox said:No you don't get it. By we, I don't mean me and a couple of friends, I mean we, the community. It's one thing for Craig to go this is what is best, but that would only suit Craig himself.
Probably a lot of people the same people who code for GP2X.stormyandcold said:My biggest problem is who's going to code for it?
Not to be disrespectful, but it doesn't actually take too much talent to port an emulator.stormyandcold said:On gp2x the 1st thing I ever tried was emulation, specifically megadrive and snes. Are we going to have the talent left to port all the emu's etc?
TI has been working on Linux for OMAP, there's a site for it (sorry, don't have the link right now).. I assume craig and team will be working on stuff in that area too.stormyandcold said:Who's going to write the os?
No. The performance to power utilization ratio is much worse for x86. It's also more expensive, and there aren't really a lot of great x86 SoCs to pick from.stormyandcold said:Will it be x86 compatible?
You're going to have to go with emulation instead then.stormyandcold said:Maybe I'm just going with the times but having proper x86 compatibility is a big plus for me especially with the big back catalogue of pc games available.
I sure am really tired of hearing about the Eee... If it makes you feel better it'll probably cost less than the Eee.stormyandcold said:The other concern regarding price, thats why I've pointed out the eee pc, no I dont have 1 but yes, something like that is very appealing especially since the biggest plus is i dont have to rely on coders as the majority of stuff is already out there that i'd like to use.
So get a laptop. You don't need a handheld for standalone things like that. Go get your precious Eeestormyandcold said:My dream system would be something of a jack of all trades and right now I want something that I can take with me to gig with while running guitar rig 3 for my guitar.
Oops, spoke too soon! "Yet"? What do you think, that that software is actually going to get faster so it can run on low end x86 laptops? That's the good thing about highend ARM hardware is that the developers have been using slower versions, not faster ones. So they have actually been trying to write high performance code.stormyandcold said:Unfortunately, I've had the guys over at the forums do a test for me and it would seem that it's not fast enough to do what I want with it...yet.
A_SN said:lol, the community, riiight. Look, that GP2X Standards thing is a failure as in nobody in the community gave a fuck about what it said. It had no fucking impact. You can do it again with the Craiginator but still no one will give a fuck about it.PokeParadox said:No you don't get it. By we, I don't mean me and a couple of friends, I mean we, the community. It's one thing for Craig to go this is what is best, but that would only suit Craig himself.
Now, why should Craig know better than us and decide better than us? Because he has the vision, and that's something only geniuses can understand. When you've got the vision, you know just what you want, you know where you're going, you know how to make your vision become an awesome reality, you see much further than anyone. People suggest things, make comments, but you dismiss them because they're off the mark, they're too short sighted, and they never understand what your vision was like until you're done with completing everything related to it.
That's why Craig knows better, he decides how the hardware is going to be like, how the (built-in) software is going to be like, and how the basic experience for the user will be like. That's why his input and guidelines are essential, for us to allow ourselves to participate in prolongating this experience in a consistent and awesome way in our programs. Now excuse me, I'm off to meditate on Zombo.com
The more times the lie is told, the more likely they are to believe it. We shall cleanse the world of mankind's one disease and ensure a bright future for the Aryan race. Hail Hitler, hail Hitler, hail Hitler.
coldfis said:An on-screen board is far more elegant than a tiny "real" board
I feel the need for a TelcoLou-ish "FAIL!"-picture. Involving Hitler. And feces.imec said:The more times the lie is told, the more likely they are to believe it. We shall cleanse the world of mankind's one disease and ensure a bright future for the Aryan race. Hail Hitler, hail Hitler, hail Hitler.
Xmoon said:This can be done in Craiginator?
http://tabletblog.com/2007/11/free-palmos-...a-internet.html
A Palm Emulator? Sure. Don't expect to run that particular version however as even if it's compiled for the same processor architecture, I'm betting the screen or input routines will need changing. So... we'd need source code to port it.
It can be added, though I think that it's unlikely it will be added to the Craiginator (additional costs etc).Moxie said:Nope. No tactile feedback at all = Bad.
Moxie said:I feel the need for a TelcoLou-ish "FAIL!"-picture. Involving Hitler. And feces.imec said:The more times the lie is told, the more likely they are to believe it. We shall cleanse the world of mankind's one disease and ensure a bright future for the Aryan race. Hail Hitler, hail Hitler, hail Hitler.
There are problems with community-driven standards:
1) The community needs to have the device first, to figure out what works and what doesn't. To get the feel for the buttons, the button placements, the accessability of i.e. simultaneous key presses or touchscreen fiddling whilst operating the controls. The feel of the keyboard, those kind of things.
Then, the community needs to argue pointlessly in forum threads for about 2-3 months, calling each other things like "You analog hitler you" and bemoaning that the position of the headphone jack makes it impossible to use as an emulator for the SFX-9000B console, which absolutely requires that
the console can be held at at 37 degree angle whilst standing on the head.
By then, either all the devs have given up and gone their separate ways again, with their own preferred control schemes and directory structures, or nobody has been devving at all and the console is dead from lack of software.
2) Community-driven standards means the community must agree. I leave it up to you as a mediator to make, say, DaveC agree with, say, Orkie or AtomicThumbs.
Now, it's not like we're talking about the plans for world domination here. It would be a recommendation or a hint sheet - "Ok, methinks that if you have no very compelling reason to do otherwise, I think it'd be peachy if left trigger+select brought up the menu, and if you made /programs/games the default install dir". I'm not sure if they're needed (then again, I'm one of the few taht actually reads the READMEs), but if they are and are to stand a chance to be used, they need to be available from the first day, not half a year later when the community has beaten itself to exhaustion over the relative merits of /bin/games versus /usr/local/apps.
Exactly.
@A_SN: I never said that I would want to do another standards site, but as the post I quoted it makes sense to prepare these things early so we don't have a mish-mash of control-schemes, ROMs in every directory except /roms/ and so forth.
GP2X Standards was launched for the simple fact that at that time many users were complaining about such problems, and some of the things that were proposed did actually feed their way into apps... obviously not yours... but it was useful to some people, at least to get them thinking more clearly about usability of control schemes, etc. Unfortunately Tripmonkey_uk managed to brick his 2x and lost interest in maintaining the site, but what can you do? I'm not trying to pimp my own site, or whatever you seem to be thinking (Someone mentioned the Standards site, so I linked them, it's that simple...) and it seems you are just looking for a target to vent some steam... I dunno. But the main point is, I do think we should try to find "best fit" guidelines(I'm well aware that you can't please everyone...) as soon as we know the layout of the controls, etc.
EDIT: PS I also read the readmes.
Squidge said:Xmoon said:This can be done in Craiginator?
http://tabletblog.com/2007/11/free-palmos-...a-internet.html
A Palm Emulator? Sure. Don't expect to run that particular version however as even if it's compiled for the same processor architecture, I'm betting the screen or input routines will need changing. So... we'd need source code to port it.
There's always POSE, which will emulate 68000-based Palms.
If you lump UMPC, MIDs and handheld gaming devices together, ofcourse, you'll get the performance you require from a UMPC first.stormyandcold said: