Nope. Not missing the point. Just seeing it as being redundant. Pick up your Pandora. Hold it comfortably with your thumbs on the nubs. Naturally arc your thumbs down and in over the keyboard area. They first impact the R and U keys. Down and in from those are F and H. Down and out from those are D and J. You can skip them all and swing them to the bottom row and naturally land on C and N. No bumps, lumps, shapes or scrapes required. Locating off of the nubs and natural thumb arc is JUST as effective as mangling keys.
Need another method? Hold the Pandora comfortably. Stretch both thumbs to the middle of the 2nd row of the keyboard. Unless you have one thumb substantially larger than the other, they will meet on the G key - which is dead center in the layout.
(Again) Booth of these methods have the catch, that you need to have the Pyra always in the same position in your hand,otherwise you either need an exact memory of where the keys are located or you need to start counting row numbers with your fingers.
BUTBUT that's not the F and J keys of a normal keyboard!!! How can we touch type??? Anyone asking that question either has no idea how small these keyboards are or has the hands of a pixie. The Pandora is 108mm from the left edge of Q to the right edge of P. That is 10 keys in space of 5.5 keys on a 'normal keyboard'. I.e. the space from the left edge of Q to the middle of the Y key on the keyboard you're probably using now. It is a thumb keyboard.
I am not sure F and J are an ideal position for these special surface characteristic
Tack on the backlight - which gives a peripheral vision point of reference - and the issue becomes moot.
Peripheral vision is just that, its there to recognize movement on the ends of your field of view - everything else requires processing and the shift of attention and/or focus, thus you can just look at the keyboard, instead of trying to pretend that your peripheral vision does something else.
Why do I not want them? Every small device I have ever had that HAS bumps on the keys winds up triggering those keys as I brush my thumb over the key to reach one beyond it. Brushing your thumb over the key tops DOES depress them slightly - but without triggering. Hit a bump and it pulls the key top sideways and down, sometimes triggering a false key. So - then you hold your thumbs higher, and loose the tactile nature of running your thumb over it to begin with.
Your personal experience against mine - never had this problem with other devices that sported some kind of marking, so this is rather a moot point (unless you have a bigger user group with the same user experience up your sleeve)..
The other reason is aesthetics. It's easy to add an imperfection. It's nearly impossible to remove one.
Form always has to follow function, especially if you can hardly notice the difference visually
I already know i prefer blank keys, so its a disadvantage to me.
Aha - its bad because I think its bad > ???
But the rest brings up some good points
Haraldur cant touch type now on a pandora, whereas i can, maybe people are different, what do I know.
Exactly, but (to me) it seems like an easy tradeoff (oh my god call the cops the Pyra will suffer from imperfection) that is potentially beneficial for new users (or maybe even reviewers) that are on the opposite side of the "keyboard pros" spectrum
What im saying is there is no evidence that this change for sure helps for mobile keyboards (for those people?) in that matter. One small small drop of polyurethane glue on each key that hardens, or something that peels off, is all it takes to test. It should be tested. If it is tested to work then thats at-least a frame of reference to go by.
The potential benefit to be had could just as easily go the other way, where it could be problematic is it could rub against the screen, damaging the screen like we see on many laptops, or it could produce visually disturbing effects with the backlighting. Could be good, could be bad. I like to side with known-good.
This is a valid concern, but specifically against having some kind of raised material on the keys, but not against the idea in general (> cavity)
What we do know is that the keyboard company can make single buttons , behaving like single buttons. (thats the baseline of what they have to get right) As soon as you start straying away from that, you add another level of complexity with potential downfall.
Thats why this is not meant has a "DEMAND" but a suggestion that ED can explore if he wishes to