Vlynndar
It was a resistor.
Wade-newb said:First post.
The Pandora iz da sh1te!
ignore heavy netspeak please.
Wooot!
Pre-ordering within the next 5 minutes.
(yes I was a lurker >_>)
Welcome and good luck
Last edited by a moderator:
Wade-newb said:First post.
The Pandora iz da sh1te!
ignore heavy netspeak please.
Wooot!
Pre-ordering within the next 5 minutes.
(yes I was a lurker >_>)
Wade-newb said:First post.
The Pandora iz da sh1te!
ignore heavy netspeak please.
Wooot!
Pre-ordering within the next 5 minutes.
(yes I was a lurker >_>)
Vlynndar said:Wade-newb said:First post.
The Pandora iz da sh1te!
ignore heavy netspeak please.
Wooot!
Pre-ordering within the next 5 minutes.
(yes I was a lurker >_>)
Welcome and good luck![]()
craigix said:Ed may well do a test with the wifi left on.
I'd expect it to drop to around 6 hours with it on, wifi is pretty hungry.
naaaaa! Na! Na.
Imagine you've got a bunch of switches which push a bunch of other switches which push a bunch of other switches in a long line with the last bunch of switches being the output.skyeyemachine said:Forgive me if this is a stupid question, but what is it about the X86 that generates so much heat/uses so much power versus the ARM architecture? Does the X86 perform many more overhead calculations, or something to that effect? My initial encounter with the Pandora was really the first time I clued in to the different architectures, having only ever much thought about X86 and 64-bit PC chipsets as related to common PCs, and it's made me curious about what makes the different architectures unique (as well as what else is out there).
craigix said:The factory are sending some more cases with the requested fixes.
ZoxFox said:craigix said:The factory are sending some more cases with the requested fixes.
so that means the cases are NOW on the way to mweston?
WizardStan said:Imagine you've got a bunch of switches which push a bunch of other switches which push a bunch of other switches in a long line with the last bunch of switches being the output.skyeyemachine said:Forgive me if this is a stupid question, but what is it about the X86 that generates so much heat/uses so much power versus the ARM architecture? Does the X86 perform many more overhead calculations, or something to that effect? My initial encounter with the Pandora was really the first time I clued in to the different architectures, having only ever much thought about X86 and 64-bit PC chipsets as related to common PCs, and it's made me curious about what makes the different architectures unique (as well as what else is out there).
At the front, you push a bunch of the switches. It takes energy to push the switches, and each layer of switches increases the amount of energy you need to push on the first switch.
ARM is a simple architecture, there's only a few levels of switches. x86 is more complex, there are more layers of switches, so it takes more energy. More energy means more heat.
Basically. It's a lot more complicated than that, but that should be close enough.
craigix said:Ed may well do a test with the wifi left on.
I'd expect it to drop to around 6 hours with it on, wifi is pretty hungry.
