I have noticed that while the gp2x will have commercial software, that most people seem to be vocal about keeping the software for it very open (understandably). I am just curious as to whether there is actually much interest in the commercial offerings (whether homebrew or pro).
Notes:
By commercial, I just mean charging for software, not whether made by a game company or some programmer doing it on the side.
I probably dont have all possible feelings covered, so, feel free to type in and reply.
The prices are just random numbers, so, call the $50 'retail' game price (Whatever that may be, 20-50ish), and the $10, 'cheap' ($3-20-ish).
Assume the software in question is of high quality, and that you have already tried a demo, shareware, friend's copy or whatever and have enjoyed it. Maybe PSP isnt the best example, (3d oriented versus 2d oriented). But assume the game is complete, enjoyable and not (as someone posted) just a Snakes game.
The options are not mutually exclusive, so, answer the highest up the scale you would go (i.e. if you dont mind paying for games, but also have donated, but still prefer open source, then answer dont mind paying, etc.) It is obvious that most people would rather have free over pay (all other things being equal).
If you really havnt paid for a non-retail piece of software, but really have always meant to, please be honest and answer 'but havnt yet' Also, I should add 'in the last 2 years or so' so as to avoid any references to the heyday of shareware, where I think most people paid for shareware at one time or another.
And, yes, I have seen some similar conversation scattered in the threads, but I thought a poll would be interesting.
And, no, I do not mean to open a big nasty can of worms
replace 'must be free' with 'should be open/free/etc' if you so choose.
Notes:
By commercial, I just mean charging for software, not whether made by a game company or some programmer doing it on the side.
I probably dont have all possible feelings covered, so, feel free to type in and reply.
The prices are just random numbers, so, call the $50 'retail' game price (Whatever that may be, 20-50ish), and the $10, 'cheap' ($3-20-ish).
Assume the software in question is of high quality, and that you have already tried a demo, shareware, friend's copy or whatever and have enjoyed it. Maybe PSP isnt the best example, (3d oriented versus 2d oriented). But assume the game is complete, enjoyable and not (as someone posted) just a Snakes game.
The options are not mutually exclusive, so, answer the highest up the scale you would go (i.e. if you dont mind paying for games, but also have donated, but still prefer open source, then answer dont mind paying, etc.) It is obvious that most people would rather have free over pay (all other things being equal).
If you really havnt paid for a non-retail piece of software, but really have always meant to, please be honest and answer 'but havnt yet' Also, I should add 'in the last 2 years or so' so as to avoid any references to the heyday of shareware, where I think most people paid for shareware at one time or another.
And, yes, I have seen some similar conversation scattered in the threads, but I thought a poll would be interesting.
And, no, I do not mean to open a big nasty can of worms
replace 'must be free' with 'should be open/free/etc' if you so choose.