I think one thing to note about the Medfield chip is that it is a single core (though hyper threaded), this could make it easier to use the available processing power without haveing to worry about multi-threading.
I think one thing to note about the Medfield chip is that it is a single core (though hyper threaded), this could make it easier to use the available processing power without haveing to worry about multi-threading.
Yeah, but if a single 1.5GHz Cortex-A9 core is already more powerful is that really a good thing?
That second core is good to have even if you don't thread your application, or don't thread it very much. It can collect OS stuff, and you can use it to soak up all the GPU driver overhead. Just dropping a second core into a Pandora would make a huge difference for a slightly modified mupen64plus, for instance.
As long as they can't make them low power and cheap enough at least... the day you could wine modern software on such hardware would really justify using a so bad architecture, assuming decent battery life... and sorry, but even using wine on a crappy medfield is for sure much better in term of performance than running qemu on a fancy Cortex A15..
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.