SNESFAN
Retro game fanatic
That keyboard is a hideous train wreck. That said, Windows users won't likely care.
What exactly do you mean by this?
That keyboard is a hideous train wreck. That said, Windows users won't likely care.
The keyboard is riddled with obvious problems, I kind of wonder if it was influenced by another device that was never meant for this size or form factor.
I can imagine the size of the device and therefore the keyboard is based on the PCB design.
What took the longest in the whole Pyra PCB design (a few months, actually) was the little space we have. It certainly wasn't easy getting all the components and needed traces onto our small PCB, making sure no interferences, etc. occur.
The GPD Win has A LOT more space on the PCB. Less USB ports, no huge 4G modem like we have, smaller SoC, etc.
I'm sure you're right, but would you mind to compare the GPD WIN's case with the Pyra's one?Okay, here is the concern I've got with the keyboard / controls of the GPD:
First, here is a size comparison of the Pandora and the GPD Win (according to the Indiegogo specs):
View attachment 27937
I placed the left edge of the Pandora to the left rounded edge of the GPD, as that is where you hold the device in your hand.
You can clearly see how much further away from the bottom the DPad / Buttons and nubs are.
And seeing the width of the device, you can also see that the middle buttons will probably be harder to reach.
Then I took a Pandora in my hand and tested where my thumbs can reach comfortably.
With comfortably I mean: Holding the device in the palm of my hands, without stretching my fingers too much.
View attachment 27939
If you got your own Pandora, you can check this for yourself. The buttons and DPad are easily reachable for me, for the middle buttons, and the top keys I actually need to lift my palms a bit otherwise I can't easily reach them.
I think I've got pretty normal thumbs, not very long but also not very short. Probably average.
Now, translating that onto the GPD Win would be like this:
View attachment 27940
Again, I've taken the rounded edges of the device into account.
I think 7, I, J and M will be a bit uncomfy to reach.
However, the bigger issue might be the controls: To reach the DPad, Sticks or buttons properly, I cannot hold the device in the palm of my hands. My thumbs won't reach there. I would actually need to hold it somewhere at the sides.
I think some people actually always do that, but I usually hold a handheld at the edges (and reading how many Pandora users complained about the corners, I guess any others do that as well).
The thickness of the device doesn't matter much here - the edge rests in the palm of the hand, regardless of the thickness.
I won't say this will be an issue (I've never held one in my hand, so I can't tell for sure), but I fear that might be the case.
Does someone want to make a cardboard printout and test it?
Here is a last comparison picture:
View attachment 27938
What exactly do you mean by this?That keyboard is a hideous train wreck. That said, Windows users won't likely care.
Sure, can do that later, though the location of the buttons, DPad and nub has not been changed, so I don't expect a huge difference.I'm sure you're right, but would you mind to compare the GPD WIN's case with the Pyra's one?
This is the sort of thing that you would think really really needs to be prototyped before finalizing. All of the controls really. Maybe with a bare bones PCB that is only designed to handle input that they can read externally.
This thing is obviously a Pandora/Pyra knockoff and it isn't near as elaborate as Pyra.
The only feature it have that Pyra haven't is a x86 processor but still if Pyra success it will have one too.
And they putted it on indiegogo even if they don't need money so that:
-They can market it as an innovation as the Pandora formfactor is still undiscovered and Pyra isn't yet on crowfunding.
-Even if their knockoff is in early developpement they can sell it before Pyra.
That way they cut the ground from under Pyra's feet and intend to steal Pandora market just before it have a chance to blow up.
If this thing make the Pyra fail there will not be a Pyra with a x86 processor. We will end up with a pathetic knockoff rather than an originale more elaborate handheld, open, upgradable with better quality and genuine care for us customer.
Some of y'all supporting this felony is disgusting.
In the Dragonbox Shop: https://www.dragonbox.de/de/103-spendenBTW: Is there a Pyra donation method anywhere atm?
I think that is too heavy. The general idea of a small computer is nothing new.This thing is obviously a Pandora/Pyra knockoff and it isn't near as elaborate as Pyra.
The only feature it have that Pyra haven't is a x86 processor but still if Pyra success it will have one too.
And they putted it on indiegogo even if they don't need money so that:
-They can market it as an innovation as the Pandora formfactor is still undiscovered and Pyra isn't yet on crowfunding.
-Even if their knockoff is in early developpement they can sell it before Pyra.
That way they cut the ground from under Pyra's feet and intend to steal Pandora market just before it have a chance to blow up.
If this thing make the Pyra fail there will not be a Pyra with a x86 processor. We will end up with a pathetic knockoff rather than an originale more elaborate handheld, open, upgradable with better quality and genuine care for us customer.
Some of y'all supporting this felony is disgusting.
I'm pretty sure, the thickness and the roudned edges (sides and bottom) may have an deeper impact in these calculations than you may think. And of course you hold these devices different if they have a different shape. I have big hands so I may be not the standard, but for me, the GPD WIN case looks pretty sleak and ergonomic. I'm sure the controls are reachable without any issues.The thickness of the device doesn't matter much here - the edge rests in the palm of the hand, regardless of the thickness.