Touch screen??
It isn't innovative! PDAs, Nintendo DS, Zodiac, GP2X F-200, mobile phones,... Already lots of gadgets have touch screen...
Let's take another step!
An example of what I think could be the future for handheld systems are the
multi touch screen:
http://cs.nyu.edu/~jhan/ftirtouch/]link[/url] :blink:
As the NDS, GP2X F-200, PDAs,... it would be really friendly to navigate, but still more for example to scale photos with 2 fingers and so.
About how to hold the system to play with touch screen. Nobody complained to Craig?? You can't play touch screen in the way it is placed because touching with the stylus the screen would go back, and furthermore more vertical position than buttons is not comfortable. That's the reason all the touch gadchets have the buttons in the same face than touch screen.
So I think that for either a simple touch screen or for a multitouch screen, the screen should turn 360º and rest over the back side of controller. Just as a small tablet. It would look as 2 totally different systems: One Linux system for emulation, ports,... and an innovative new handheld system for creative homebrew creators!
It would be nice for new concept games. Really good for new puzzle games, a first person boxing game being controlled with both fat fingers, a Traumacenter but using both hands as in real life for example with the tweezers,...
And what about unlimited multiplayer in only 1 system? Of course it wouldn't be comfortable for 8 people playing in one small screen, but it would be great for the common 2player multiplayer game. Furthermore Pandora's screen isn't a small screen for a handheld system... Think for example in a 2player 2D fighting game making the attacks with the movements of stylus, or in a multiplayer chicken shoot game, or in a band music game playing each instrument in a part of the screen. Think about a Twister party game but playing with fingers of different players over the screen. It would be hilarious!
The actual handheld systems are for 1 player. Shouldn't we share them with family or friends? Yes, you can play with turn based games as Worms, or you can play simultaneosly buying other handheld system, or now you can even play in the TV with something like a dock station for GP2X and buying several extra controllers. But there is not still a 100% multiplayer handheld in the market. A handheld you can play real multiplayer, anywhere, and with the need of additional system or accesories or even tv.
Other good thing would be being able to have the buttons in the position you wish for each game. How? It is a multi touch screen, so the buttons may virtually appears on the screen. An example of virtual buttons: For the 2D fighting game, each player could hold the system by one half and use shoulder button for protection, virtual digital pad to move character, and pencil for the attacks. Or action buttons for action movements such as shoot or punch.
These are just a couple of ideas but sure lot of things more can be done with multi touch screen. Homebrew community is sometimes really creative, so sure some interesting homebrew games appears just as happens with DS.
But maybe this technology is too costly. I don't know. And the example of multi-touch screen is not good for retro market. Not useful for emulators. Although maybe if it is really powerful it could emulate NDS system. I see it a bit utopia, but it would kick ass! There is already NDS emulators for computer so maybe something can be done. Or at least for NDS homebrew games...
Those are only my thoughs. Of course all you will know much better how to do it. I have no idea how a whole game system is made. But seems so simple as replacing the touch screen by multitouch screen. I don't think it is much more expensive in this way... however it gives much room to innovation and will get the attention from press.
Thanks for all you who read my post. You can not share my thoughs, but this is my first post here, so don't be so bad with me