MDave
ZEQ2 Lite Developer
I think some money should go towards getting a hold of the source for the nubs, opengl es drivers and anything else thats closed. And perhaps, a group of developers for Pandora exclusive games.
antheus123 said:mame4all and gngeo is all i want i'd donate for those
Pickle said:antheus123 said:mame4all and gngeo is all i want i'd donate for those
pickle.gp2x.de/gngeo-pnd.zip
MonkeyChops said:Pickle said:antheus123 said:mame4all and gngeo is all i want i'd donate for those
pickle.gp2x.de/gngeo-pnd.zip
Awesome! Ask and you shall receive! Thanks Pickle, you da man! Guess I know what I'll be doing tonight
gpx74532 said:I would also like to see all packages to be available in one place - at the moment I get the impression some are in the files area of GP32X, some are on the AppStore and some are on developers websites. This defeats the objective of an AppStore.
Ari64 said:Well, the problem with this example is that it took me a few months to rewrite the dynamic recompiler, but I spent the next year fixing and debugging it. So I'm not sure what bounties for something like that will get you, probably something that just barely works well enough to collect the bounty.
iprice said:I think we need to encourage not just ports, or "me-too" stuff, but software that is exclusive to the Pandora. We need to show that Pandora is more than just an emulation station or a media encyclopedia. Show people software that no other machine has, or do something that no other handheld can do. Sure the other stuff is nice, but most of us can do all of that on a laptop/netbook. I didn't just buy a Pandora so I could have mini-laptop functionality. I want to see so much more than stuff that has been mentioned here.
But what you're asking is for people to develop software that's only made available on Pandora when it could probably exist on PC without much extra work. Why would you expect people to artificially restrict their userbase? I don't think the bounties should be used to encourage this; OP isn't Sony and shouldn't be buying exclusivity contracts (not that they could really afford it).
Re this and various "e.g. Fix up the Amiga Emu" posts.craigix said:We already have the development fund, the question is, who gets it and for what?
On that note, I seem to remember having the impression that the dev fund was finding a place licensing something (Doom3 was a possible suggestion, I believe) which someone in OPT could then port and sell. Did that idea completely dissolve, or am I just making stuff up?silver said:Maybe he could be offered cash to release it/license it.
WizardStan said:On that note, I seem to remember having the impression that the dev fund was finding a place licensing something (Doom3 was a possible suggestion, I believe) which someone in OPT could then port and sell. Did that idea completely dissolve, or am I just making stuff up?silver said:Maybe he could be offered cash to release it/license it.