Point taken, deleting. Where should I post it?I question the need to post it here.
Point taken, deleting. Where should I post it?I question the need to post it here.
Since a single tweet can't really contain much context at all, I think this equation can be generalised:Like I said, lack of context = clickbait
Depends, some people create a tweet roll/thread because they still try to write in sufficient detail. It would be interesting if Japan’s mastered the art of concise tweeting in the same way they have Bonsaï, “tiny houses” and Danshari.Since a single tweet can't really contain much context at all, I think this equation can be generalised:
twitter = lack of context = clickbait
or more simply:
twitter = clickbait
Is there no equivalent of “SplitMyFare” in France?Same if you want to travel with trains, you can't take long distance ones, have to take small jumps so pay a lot more.
I challenge your "just isn't true". I think you are suffering from cognitive dissonance. People get upset when their beliefs are challenged. And I get it, it's happening in your own country. where slowly the liberte, egalite and fraternite is eroding. It's still there, but it's eroding, eroding fast. So you comply, as to belong to the winning group. The Stockholm syndrome group.to push an alternate narrative that just isn't true
twitter = clickbait (divide both sides by "it")twitter = clickbait
Never heard about something like that.Is there no equivalent of “SplitMyFare” in France?
Ah, so the government only makes life difficult for those who do not comply but they do not make life impossible for them. Let's see how long that lasts and whether it gets worse. After all, if they can change 2 weeks into 1.5 + year, then they ought to be able to make something worse of this as well. We already proved that we will comply with whatever their demands are, even if it destroys society as we know it.It's a bit more complex than that. When the epidemic is on the rise, the local authorities can ask for large malls (more than 20 square meters) to require the vaccination pass (or a negative test), provided there are other smaller shops for basic necessities in the immediate vicinity.
So it's only a handful of malls that are concerned, and people who can't shop for food there always have an alternative where they don't need a pass.
This tweet is obvious propaganda, twisting reality to push an alternate narrative that just isn't true and I question the need to post it here.
Seeing how it is very closely related to CoViD-19, it probably ought to go in some thread about CoViD-19 or related closely related issues.Point taken, deleting. Where should I post it?
I wonder if these measures are better or worse for the impacted people in the long run.Ah, so the government only makes life difficult for those who do not comply but they do not make life impossible for them. Let's see how long that lasts and whether it gets worse. After all, if they can change 2 weeks into 1.5 + year, then they ought to be able to make something worse of this as well. We already proved that we will comply with whatever their demands are, even if it destroys society as we know it.
Also, I did not watch the video, but the text just says that they are not allowed into supermarkets, and you confirmed that that is correct. So how is that propaganda? Real propaganda is misleading, such as claiming that the lockdowns will only last for 2 weeks even though it will last for multiple years or that CoViD-19 makes peple drop dead on the street and changed Wuhan into a ghost town even though CoViD-19 is hardly worse than the flu. Stating that people are not allowed into supermarkets without vaccine passport, when they are not allowed into supermarkets without vaccine passport is not propaganda but just truthful reporting.
It's propaganda because the post and the tweet claim this is throught france. It's not, it's just in hotspots.Also, I did not watch the video yet, but the text just says that they are not allowed into supermarkets, and you confirmed that that is correct. So how is that propaganda?
Please stop with this. I don't know any flu that can put an otherwise healthy 35 year old in hospital and then kill them, but covid-19 can do that if you're unvaccinated.even though CoViD-19 is hardly worse than the flu.
Would be if you hadn’t put “vaccine” before “passport” and if you hadn’t refuted that the situation is rather more nuanced than you imply.truthful reporting
I was just responding to levi's argument. I was not actually making claims about French.Would be if you hadn’t put “vaccine” before “passport” and if you hadn’t refuted that the situation is rather more nuanced than you imply.
It is not a “vaccine”-only passport; it is a “health passport” that includes being vaccinated OR having a negative test certificate issued within a set time period before you attend whatever event/location requires a “health passport”.
I won’t repeat others’ explanations here as you already decided to gloss over those but I have corrected your insistence that this constitutes truthful reporting, whilst your analysis of it is wilfully misleading.
One reason why I think that this will not happen is that the government can just close these businesses anytime they want. In the Netherlands small businesses were closed for months in a row. The French government could probably also close any business any time that it wants under the banner of safety. So if small businesses become bad for the government then those small businesses are gone.Those people will probably ban together and create parallel social structures to purchase their food and other items making them more independent.
Which might be worse for the government, as the grip on the group of people they would like to control is much lower compared to regular folks.
You didn't even quote me. I have a hard enough time keeping up with this thread without you replying to me without quoting me.I was just responding to levi's argument. I was not actually making claims about French.
Either way, the CoViD-19 passport that you describe is still pretty bad.
Sorry, I meant Elpoco. I was replying to Elpoco's argument, not yours. I confused you two.You didn't even quote me. I have a hard enough time keeping up with this thread without you replying to me without quoting me.
One reason why I think that this will not happen is that the government can just close these businesses anytime they want. In the Netherlands small businesses were closed for months in a row. The French government could probably also close any business any time that it wants under the banner of safety. So if small businesses become bad for the government then those small businesses are gone.
Other than that, most people are not self-sufficient like that anymore and neither are they principled and smart enough to realise that freedom is a prerequisite of safety. Probably, many people will just give in to the coercion so that they can get their way of life that they are used to back.
Of course, this will have the opposite effect. The more you give in, the worse the regime and measures become. Remember how in the beginning we only gave in to 2 weeks to flatten the curve? That has gradually grown to 1.5 years (and still counting) & coerced vaccines. I saw that coming pretty early on, but months ago some pro-lockdowners here argued against me that the measures were about to end so evidently this did come as a surprise to those folks. And they are in for many more of this kind of surprises.