Thank you. I'm just getting thin-skinned or does anyone else find that this
should be Kyriakides instead ? When you treat a health problem as an economy problem you end up with neither health nor economy.
There, as I (and the WHO) were saying. Not sure is serious, not sure it comes from African, but it's going to happen eventually if not now.
I thought the non-mRNA ones were actual vaccines (in the sense of the pre-Covid-19 definition) so why did you put them in “”?Healthcare people in France win the right to get non-mRNA "vaccines".
Guadeloupe : les soignants auront accès à des vaccins sans ARN messager
Guadeloupe : les soignants auront accès à des vaccins sans ARN messagerwww.laprovence.com
Ngl as an explanation that sounds rather too simplistic, particularly for a 20 minute long statement, and did she really witness all of those “vaccinations”? It’s also a rather curious set up for a press release :SYou were promised you would be out, but you are not...
What are our collective priorities?
What are YOUR priorities as we near 2022? — Mickey Z.
Mickey Z. — World News Trust October 28, 2021 I was walking down the street when I noticed a man sitting behind the wheel of a double-parked car, cursing and angry. His face was a mask of rage. I stopped and attempted to discern the source of his fury. Clearly, this man must be fed up with...worldnewstrust.com
Yesterday a great scandal broke out in Slovenia, and today all of Slovenia is talking about vaccinations. The head nurse of the University Medical Center, a clinical center in Ljubljana, which deals with the reception of bottles and manages everything, gave up, went in front of the cameras and took out the bottles of vaccines. She showed people the codes on the bottles, each labeled 1, 2 or 3, and then explained the meaning of the codes.
Number 1 is placebo, saline.
Number 2 is the classic RNA bottle.
Number 3 is the RNA stick containing the onc gene, related to adenovirus, which contributes to the development of cancer.
The number 3 says that people who get them will have soft tissue cancer within 2 years. She says that she personally witnessed the vaccinations of all politicians and tycoons, and they all received preparation # 1.
source: Dude trust me/ Internet:
Not credible. I don't know Slovenia, but I don't think it's that different from the parts of the EU I know.
Adenoviriae don't give you cancer. The worst a human adenovirus infection can do is give you pneumonia, in extreme situations (far more commonly it just gives you a dicky tummy), and as far as I've heard these vaccines are actually made from chimp adveoviriae which aren't adapted for the human system that well.
stevekirsch.substack.com
It seems the wave is passing...
www.nhnieuws.nl
Our canary is on vacation for Thanksgiving.@JDTAY Yo, canary! Still alive?
It’s really interesting reading about analysis being applied to the available data and noting that even these analyses have pitfalls of their own* but the one thing I think every soundly motivated person should be able to agree on is the need for open source data with peer-reviewed analysis - just like how FLOSS projects are supposed to work...From Statistician Mathew Crawford:
UK data shows the vaccines are NOT saving any lives at all. (injections kill more people than they save)
direct source: direct sourceUK data shows the vaccines are NOT saving any lives at all. Zero. Zip. Nada.
Mathew Crawford just did an analysis showing that the data from the UK shows that the vaccines aren't saving any lives at all. Zero. Zip. Nada. So we're killing over 150K people to save no lives. Wow.
Similar sounds from German statisticians Prof. Steyer and Dr. Kappler from their research in one of the the 16 German provinces.
Their conclusions:
Full vaccinations increase the chance of dying. Secondary reason: higher vaccination coverage is reached through heightened stress and fear. The latter leads to increased mortality.
Did not dive into the numbers and correlation does not mean causation. Just look at this figure:
Yes, the lines go both up at the end, but not at the beginning of this year... so there is a correlation now, and not then. It could be a delayed thing, but then the proof gets harder. Especially because that red line goes down at the end, so that's still correlation, but not clear-cut. Though this is USA information, if true in UK and Germany (one state), it should be similar in the rest of the world that uses the same vax, right?
An astute forum member could say that deaths v/s excess deaths is not the same as vaccinations v/s excess deaths. True, true... I just was making a point and took this nice graph as an example.
@JDTAY Yo, canary! Still alive?
edit:
Looked at the German figures, at least:
View attachment 37656
The X axis the the amount of vaccination in % the Y axis is the excess deaths.
Now on the bottom left we see Saksen, followed by Thüringen which "proofs" low vaccination is low excess mortality, but then you have BB and HB that contradict it. I mean, I can not draw an easily visible line/curve through the datapoints.
I don't mind a healthy debate about research; both sides providing research and evidence to prove their points.
That proves 100% that vaccination is not good for you.
Challenge accepted.
