vadsamoht said:
Firstly, I doubt the `general public' you speak of will ever even know that the Pandora exists, and the few that do probably won't be interested. Like you, I also think that the pandora is more than just a unique gadget, BUT that's no reason to stick you fingers in your ears every time someone mentions a problem/etc. All the more reason for us as a community to emphasise its uniqueness.
Woah... who said anything about sticking fingers in ears? Jeeze that was the point of the disclaimer, to AVOID any baseless accusations like these... altho maybe you're just saying so and not really saying it to
me... in which case I don't care, say what you wanna say and ignore the rest of what I have to say.
If that WAS intended to be a jab at me I protest, sir. You do not know my qualms or how I doth keep my tongue in check!
If I were to truly speak my mind on some of the issues pertaining to the hardware you would all think that SomeGuy99 was a paragon of kindness compared to me. Alas, as a licensed Amateur Radio operator I strive to stay within the good code of conduct for communication as established in the gentleman's agreement and know how futile such things would be. So don't go thinking I'm a fanboi just because I think the Pandora is more than just a unique gadget.
If you'd ever met me IRL you'd probably be sick of hearing about the Pandora by now, so I know there's quite a few members of the "general public" as I describe it who know what the Pandora is. Additionally, I work in high-tech electronics manufacturing... I, of ANYBODY, could
really point out some flaws in the device if I deemed it necessary. Don't think I'm ignorant just because I DON'T.