quartercast
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 13, 2007
- Messages
- 1,551
Thanks ED, that makes sense. So will you introduce a DM3730 preorder at a higher premium? How will the transition work.
?
?
Thanks ED, that makes sense. So will you introduce a DM3730 preorder at a higher premium? How will the transition work.
?
I hope you meant 256 MB.
I'd sell them side by side with the DM3730 at a higher price until the old ones run out, then it can go for the 600mhz price. Unless they sell really well of course then I wouldn't lower the price as long as they keep moving I think I remember ED or Craig saying they cost about the same so the higher price will help cover the risk of getting stuck with the old ones.
Ah ok.The DSP is not easier to program (why should it, it's thee exact same one?)
Read that article again, the part about the DSP becoming easier to program tells you that they have now included it royalty free in the SDK and later they mention over 200 DSPs that can now be programmed using C.
TI didn't release that API and royalty free source code examples before the DM3730, so you HAD a harder time to use the DSP before that, but you can now do so on the 3530.
Nah !!! That is not an acceptable answer !Well, if we don't have any preorders left and are only producing the DM3730, you will also get that one when you preordered... where should we get different units?
But geeez, it's a long way until then.
You suggested slashing the price of the older pandoras rather than having an inflated price for the DM3730 pandoras, which is what everyone was against.I'd sell them side by side with the DM3730 at a higher price until the old ones run out, then it can go for the 600mhz price. Unless they sell really well of course then I wouldn't lower the price as long as they keep moving I think I remember ED or Craig saying they cost about the same so the higher price will help cover the risk of getting stuck with the old ones.
That's the conclusion I reached on the previous page but unfortunately I got my head bitten off and I'm currently running around like a headless chicken.
As the DM3730 is produced with 45nm, the battery time doesn't change at all.
My testing unit has nearly the same battery time as my normal unit.
The SoC doesn't need that much battery anyways - most of the power is being used by the WiFi module and the LCD Backlight.
I think people are tearing up about the fact some of your team have the 3730 SOCs, yet you're selling the 3530. I don't get it but id recommend focusing in the current hardware and not feeding the trolls