It struck me that by arranging the Fn keys as a section on the left, numbers on a section on the right I could shift the QWERTYUIOP row up one and allow symbols to flow in around and between - which allowed the symbols between to be made up of related sets.
On the embedded number pad - yes I did them like a phone on purpose. There is a clear stated idea for the Pyra to have phone capabilities. When dialing with one thumb, most people are 'more used' to the phone layout. Personally, I would prefer a standard computer 10 key. Either one would get across the main ideas of this layout. It's on the right side to follow 90% of the population - sorry lefties. The important part at this stage is the overall concept - not which direction the keys run in the keypad.
Is what I put up a finalized keyboard in a can? Not even close. It was built on the fly with no real thought given to testing. That could come later if people decide to embrace the overall layout concept.
Several people seem to be freaked out about the 4+shift4 = 8 German key labels I put in. I already had more symbols on the keyboard than there are in a standard 105 type - and had 8 left over. There was talk that ED would like easier German accessibility, so I threw those in there. It wasn't meant to be offensive. I don't even speak German.
So - what this is really about is the concepts of:
1. Moving the QWERTYIOP row up to the top.
2. Embedding the F1-F12 keys off to the left side to become their own 'keypad'.
3. Embedding a numeric keypad (Phone or computer style TBD) on the right.
4. Pairing like symbols together - then centering those pairs in a column so they're all easily found.
5. Grouping like-kinds together, .°. (period, degrees mark, Pyra-shifted period for numeric pad) on one key - which if it weren't for copyright's I'd want to connect with thin lines to make the Stargate Earth origin address symbol. ' " ` became one column - find any of the 3 and you've found them all. There are lots of examples of this, l | ! for example. ? ! . are all near each other.
So the basis for this is classification of symbols by type and arranging them in a way that suits symbol types or types of actions.
I had considered moving all of the vowels into one corner then sharp and soft consonants around - but that wouldn't hold up to international use and QWERTY is so ubiquitous that it would be pointless to pursue that side of it.
So - on a conceptual basis is this something worth pursuing?