Monk
Caveman Ninja
jb0yx said:Well Got to start somewhere, if nobody makes software that actually reaches the extent of what this can do... there won't ever be a need to have something more powerful right?Pleng said:Probably for the same reason they put a line under Gamecube or PS2 emulation: The system's not powerful enough to do anything *useful* with it.
I'm sure some talented individual could spend weeks porting/coding a PS2 emulator just to have it run at less than 1fps. But what would be the point?
Also - I can't remember the quote, but some clever chap apaprently said something like "In order to find the limits of what is possible, we must first go beyond the possible - then take one step back".
Loonie said:Is "run" really the appropriate verb?
In previous years, when speaking of Windows software, around here we switched to "crawl" all too often as a more accurate alternative... and that was on x86 hardware!
Last edited by a moderator: