telegramguy
Member
Since the Pandora will be substantially speedy, will MAME be ported over to match current mame project versions? Also, what version of mame are the pandora demo videos using?
Not sure what will be better, 60fps Outrun, or being able to play Food Fight properly with the analog.slaanesh said:That would most likely mean fullspeed of most of the games that it can emulate, such as R-Type and Mortal Kombat. With analog controllers thrown it, it will be a pretty awesome platform for portable MAME.
slaanesh said:Whoever does the port, I would imagine initially it would be 0.37b5 (same as MAME4ALL) as it wouldn't require a lot of work to get this done. Most of which would be coding replacements for Rlyeh's minimal lib. Just speculating though.
Surely ye jest!?Hirolaser said:Well Franxis doesn't seem to be interested in the Pandora..
Pandora has lots of excitement, anticipation and hype in gp32x.de, but only here. Their developers must really start a marketing campaign in the outer world Keep in mind that Franxis spends most of his time in gp32spain.com, where the Pandora is not currently a popular device at all (ugly, expensive, not internationalized, not clear applications, unfair practices, too delayed are common opinions there)danboid said:I would be very interested to here why Franxis is not interested in Pandora
Oh those crazy Spanish people what will they do next?juanvvc said:Please, keep in mind that this is the opinion of many people in gp32spain about the Pandora
juanvvc said:Pandora has lots of excitement, anticipation and hype in gp32x.de, but only here. Their developers must really start a marketing campaign in the outer world Keep in mind that Franxis spends most of his time in gp32spain.com, where the Pandora is not currently a popular device at all (ugly, expensive, not internationalized, not clear applications, unfair practices, too delayed are common opinions there)danboid said:I would be very interested to here why Franxis is not interested in Pandora
Please, keep in mind that this is the opinion of many people in gp32spain about the Pandora, but I do not know the personal opinion of Franxis. As far as I know, he never expressed his personal opinion about the Pandora.
Its a good point that easy to forget that the hype in 'here' may not be matched elsewhere... Not intending to shoot the messenger, but taking the points in turn:
Ugly - beauty is in the eye of the beholder and all that, but I think its defintely improving. I also think its one of those things that will seem very different when you see the finished article in the flesh.
Expensive - in comparison to gp2x, yes. And whilst its good value, that doesn't mean it isn't expensive and is no doubt going to be a problem of sorts.
Not Internationalized - this one intrigues me. I wonder how the gp2x / gp32 were more internationalized... ?
Unfair Practices - ? the mind boggles. Is Craig being blamed for the end of the gp2x? Seems 'a tadge' harsh
Not Clear Applications - we'll need to wait and see on that really.
Delayed - no argument, apart from better to be late and great than early and... (whats rubbish and ryhmes with early)
I guess my point is that is easy to wonder why on earth they aren't 'on board', but perhaps if it was a key member of the spanish team who had created a non-linear successor to the gp2x many on hear would be uneasy.
Lets hope when its out it collectively 'brings them round' as there are a lot of talented developers within that forum and would be a pity to split the community.
And on the way the ships will be blown away in a storm and they will all die. History lesson for all you kids.juanvvc said:Lurkio, we will send the great armada to invade you. All your Pandoras are belong to us!
I knew that my weather machine would come in handy someday.juanvvc said:Oh those crazy Spanish people what will they do next? Lurkio, we will send the great armada to invade you. All your Pandoras are belong to us!
Holy shit. Not GPH then?juanvvc said:Is Craig being blamed for the end of the gp2x? In short, yes, he is. But I find this a funny argument, because we live in a competitive, commercial world
craigix said:Holy shit. Not GPH then?juanvvc said:Is Craig being blamed for the end of the gp2x? In short, yes, he is. But I find this a funny argument, because we live in a competitive, commercial world
I also seem to remember I was blamed somehow for the death of the GP32 in Spain too?
I do read the Spanish forum sometimes, I have an account there, but my Spanish isn't so great. I'm aware of the general dislike of the Pandora (although not everyone seems to hate it) what are the other forum users planning to buy to replace the GP2X now production has stopped?
That seems incredibly unfair that they would blame you. It's not like you stopped production. Hell you kept it going as long as you could. Perhaps production would've stopped earlier without you.
Maybe they plan on going for Gizmondo 2
I agree with that, but if there are some posts by English speakers of this forum that ask to remove the keyboard, imagine the number of foreign people that find it useless. By the way, we use an extended version of qwerty. It's French that do not use qwertyguadomatic said:if Pandora is to be sold in a global market, it's much better off selling with a qwerty keyboard
Probably not that great. You're losing a fair bit of speed for little gain IMHO. Sure you get the latest ROMs but there's an awful lot of overhead in the latest versions.Fat Agnus said:I meant to write Franxis or Slaanesh in the title! How would v.106, v.118, or the current v.126 version run if it were to be coded at those versions?
The Pandora's screen isn't that big so vertical games without rotate it will look too small.slaanesh said:The high-resolution screen will be great for vertical-aspect games. No need to rotate the device (not sure if this is comfortably possible now anyway).