'EvilDragon' said:And why exactly shouldn't we use them?'adamorjames' said:It's not like any of this is going to be used.. ED and such will probably just do what they want. Nice try though. :lol:
Got the possible word from ED himself.
I hope they are used.
The generic stuff is excellent.
The creative commons license is a real good idea.
Let's forget about the licensed logos'spaceballs3000' said:If I remember right, if the SD slot ends up using the SDIO protocol (4-bit and higher) Logo or not you will need to get an license. But if you use MMC/SPI only then it's ok as SPI/MMC has open spec protocol (i.e. Dataflash), but it's going to communicate run a lot slower than SDIO.
http://www.sdcard.org/developers/join/licensing
http://www.sdcard.org/developers/faq/#licenseforlogo
Thank you !'greendots' said:I really like the designs for the activity logos PhenXDesign... they would look good on the pandora
'j.pickens' said:'EvilDragon' said:And why exactly shouldn't we use them?'adamorjames' said:It's not like any of this is going to be used.. ED and such will probably just do what they want. Nice try though. :lol:
Got the possible word from ED himself.
I hope they are used.
The generic stuff is excellent.
The creative commons license is a real good idea.
I contacted him, he told he liked the logos, and that they might be used.
How can I release them under CC ? I've added the CC logo for the second row on the image.
Yep, I also think some people missed that, to avoid any other doubt, I've added the R logo and the CC logos on the image.'Alpha2' said:yeah I think some people missed the idea that he's showing the logos that would require a licence and then also showing his alternatives that can be used in place of those to avoid fees.
The logos presented are just fine though they might be a little hard to read if the printing process can't get that much detail in the required size.
Ferinstance: Let's say you created these in Illustrator if you designed these in a stroke weith of say 3 and the tightest the printer can get is 5 then the logos will look like nothing more than an ugly drop of paint. So it'd help if we knew the capabilities of the printing process.
I don't know about the printing resolution, but I think it might be like on any mobile console: very precise, so they would be little, but readable (hope so).
You can use the Creative Commons licence generator here..''''PhenXDesign'''' said:I contacted him, he told he liked the logos, and that they might be used.
How can I release them under CC ? I've added the CC logo for the second row on the image.
I didn't mean with the wireless tower in the middle, that was just the only picture I could find of a mostly straight on shot. Except these ones..'WizardStan' said:Those headphones look like a power symbol. Don't want people to get confused.
i've just noticed the bluetooth logo, when seen sideways, really resembles the Banpresto logo :huh:''Vorporeal'' said:I think the box on the BT logo should be twisted horizontally to more accurately reflect the shape of the Pandora. Also, I think that would just look a bit nicer.
'.Gogeta§§J4BR.' said:i''ve just noticed the bluetooth logo, when seen sideways, really resembles the Banpresto logo :huh:''''Vorporeal'''' said:I think the box on the BT logo should be twisted horizontally to more accurately reflect the shape of the Pandora. Also, I think that would just look a bit nicer.
maybe it''s just me? :blink:
btw, really nice work there
ps: when will this forum be correct once again? =`( just a quick edit and bang, it's all messed up
Yes, it's just you
It is the licensed logo of the Bluetooth, I don't think it will be used on the Pandora because of copyrights, etc
I don't mind having CC logos, except for Bluetooth. Not that his Bluetooth logo is bad, it's just that I think the actual bluetooth logo would be better suited. BTW, love that headphones icon.Polossatik posted on May 19 2009 at 06:01 PM said:lovely, I hope ED uses them....