What Desktop Environment is going to be used on this?

Discussion in 'Pyra OS (Debian GNU/Linux)' started by jdog320, Oct 14, 2014.

  1. jdog320

    jdog320 Still Fresh

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2014
    Messages:
    37
    Hi, i'm just gonna ask if the XFCE desktop is going to still be used or is it going to be replaced with something like LXDE or Mate.
     
    Tags:
  2. TrashyMG

    TrashyMG Sarcasm Dispenser Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2010
    Messages:
    10,552
    Don't think it's been decided yet, Personally I'd like to see a lightweight one still be the default. like XFCE or LXDE. Mate is a bit heavier, but then again something as bloated as KDE runs okay on the devboard.. Still a lightweight one would be better IMHO.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Oct 14, 2014
    Glyph Reader likes this.
  3. Willhelm

    Willhelm Very Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2014
    Messages:
    182
    Location:
    Helmstedt
    lxqt could also be a possible desktop environment, for those who favor qt.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Oct 14, 2014
    comradekingu likes this.
  4. levi

    levi Still fresh, damnit!

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2008
    Messages:
    11,216
    Location:
    Somewhere off the coast of the EU
    Apropos nothing in particular, but I just tried out LXDE on an old P3 server of mine, and it ran okay but dragging windows was extremely laggy (it didn't seem to notice it took more than one frame to redraw the window, and kept sending out redraw requests which quickly built up a backlog).  I switched to Enlightenment17, and that works a lot better.

    Of course, the Pandora alone is faster than my old server especially for graphic stuff, so we have even more leeway with the Pyra and could use almost whatever we want.
     
  5. Granitehead

    Granitehead Advanced Member

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2011
    Messages:
    1,308
    I still suggest using something very light. Someone who is willing to pay the maybe small but certainly still noticeable hit on performance can install an alternative themselves.
     
  6. sebt3

    sebt3 homebrew player (P. & C.)

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2008
    Messages:
    4,747
    Location:
    France
    I bet the Kool Desktop Environement will be used. Hey german hardware maker have to use german software, no ?
     
  7. destraht

    destraht Still Fresh

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2014
    Messages:
    42
    I think that proper Wayland support is essential for Pyra for making a smooth desktop experience.  One year from now Wayland will graduate to being solid and ready for all desktop use cases with XWayland support for a fallback.  It would be a real shame to be stuck with a GPU driver that would never support Wayland.
     
    myNewUsername likes this.
  8. kaprikawn

    kaprikawn Very Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2008
    Messages:
    371
    Location:
    UK
    I hope XFCE isn't used, current active development is lower than alternatives.

    I'd want something that has active plans to move to more advanced technologies like the Enlightenment which is making progress towards Wayland support.
     
  9. EvilDragon

    EvilDragon Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2003
    Messages:
    19,786
    Location:
    Ingolstadt
    LXQT sounds like a good one to me.

    I've switched from KDE to LXQT on all my machines recently.
     
  10. Hồng Thất Công

    Hồng Thất Công Đả Cẩu Bổng Pháp

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2012
    Messages:
    4,380
    Location:
    Cái Bang
    ^ Can it work in Debian Wheezy?
     
  11. rygD

    rygD Nihilistic Mystic

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2014
    Messages:
    7,360
    Location:
    Everywhere
    How long did you use KDE?  Do you find LXQT lacking in any way?
     
  12. bzar

    bzar A Commando

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2008
    Messages:
    4,446
    Location:
    Finland
    On desktop I prefer KDE, but I think LXQt would be a nice fit for pyra.
     
  13. Glyph Reader

    Glyph Reader Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2014
    Messages:
    332
    How well is LXQt supported these days?  When it first came out, I remember it not working too well. 

    -Glyph Reader
     
  14. bzar

    bzar A Commando

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2008
    Messages:
    4,446
    Location:
    Finland
    From what I've heard recently no complaints.

    I tested it way back compiling most parts as there were no packages available so I couldn't tell if I was missing something :p
     
  15. GizmoTheGreen

    GizmoTheGreen Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2009
    Messages:
    829
    Location:
    Tokyo, Japan
    Why not try using Wayland? performance would be greater than sticking with X. old apps that use X can use Xwayland to run.

    Well the main problem would be if the gpu drivers support wayland and we'd need a DE that supports it, which Gnome seems to do.

    Another popular one seems to be Hawaii but it's not finished yet. GUI libraries (GTK, qt5, etc are quickly adapting Wayland as well.)

    https://www.youtube.com/embed/RIctzAQOe44?feature=oembed why we need wayland, and why it's here to replace X
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=egzb542qomY Xwayland (emulates x, but is more efficient?) cool demo video.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Oct 21, 2014
    klapse likes this.
  16. bzar

    bzar A Commando

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2008
    Messages:
    4,446
    Location:
    Finland
    There were some issues using wayland, framebuffer access or somesuch. It will probably be an option at some point, but we can't really jump in with both feet at this time without knowing whether it will be up to the task when we need it to be. Let's get a working system using known components first and then see if we can make all the same stuff work on Wayland.

    Side note: XWayland doesn't emulate X. It creates an X server and runs the application inside it. The window contents of that X server are rendered by wayland.
     
  17. EvilDragon

    EvilDragon Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2003
    Messages:
    19,786
    Location:
    Ingolstadt
    TI is supporting Wayland with the current 3D drivers, but not X anymore, so that shouldn't be the issue.


    However, wayland constantly uses the 3D driver, which means it's an additional power drain.


    And yes, the current LXQT version runs very well. Haven't found anything I'm missing. But then again, I don't use Widgets, so if you use KDE because of widgets, you'll miss somdething.
     
  18. GizmoTheGreen

    GizmoTheGreen Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2009
    Messages:
    829
    Location:
    Tokyo, Japan
    Thanks for the correction!

    But it should also mean the graphical work the cpu is not doing is done by the gpu more efficiently, so gpu can have much lower clock while only displaying 2D stuff, and the CPU can be lower frequency/cores as well. won't that save in the power?


    I'm just thinking portable devices such as android phones and tablets are drawing in 3D surfaces the whole time and still get decent if not excellent battery life.
     
  19. EvilDragon

    EvilDragon Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2003
    Messages:
    19,786
    Location:
    Ingolstadt
    Android phones get a decent battery life?

    I haven't seen one. When using the phone, it drains the battery like hell (never been able to "use" an Android phone for more than 3 - 4 hours).

    Only in standby (which means no graphics are shown) the battery time is decent.

    The CPU still has to create the graphical output (the contents to show), so I doubt it'll remove a lot of stress from the CPU.

    AFAIK, X only updates the areas that change graphically, so the on normal usage, the CPU doesn't have much to do.
     
    dimag0g and Cerbera like this.
  20. Cerbera

    Cerbera Ecnes

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2007
    Messages:
    9,111
    Tell that to the battery pack that I have to keep permanently attached to my phone. :)
     

Share This Page

Loading...