EvilDragon said:
They told us the remaining boards will be done by Oct 18. They never told us they will start RIGHT AWAY in fullspeed with it. They might've had a different job before us, they needed to properly align the machines.
Who knows? 1000 boards is more than they did within the last 4 months - and they did them pretty quickly.
I'm happy if boards finally get produced with a better speed, and that's definately an improvement.
The manually placed parts can be put on the boards while the machines are running and producing more boards.
Maybe, but it's a lot slower than the 500/week they claim they're capable of, which still isn't enough to finish by the 18th. It's like saying "well, the nub company is really doing a bang-up job on the testing now, not too much longer!" when we really should be saying "HTH didn't they do the proper testing before, to meet the capabilities that they'd previously promised?"
What are the repercussions to them if they haven't finished populating the boards (aside from the nubs, which they won't have) by the 18th?
EvilDragon said:
I know. But it won't help. If half of the nubs of 4000 units fail within the next 6 months, the project pretty much is doomed, as I doubt there would be many people who'd buy new units then and we would probably go bust from RMA costs.
This needs to be done very thoroughly.
Even worse: The company will definately not guarantee for the nubs until they are confident of their high quality - and that means: If anything fails, it's our fault and they won't cover any costs.
As soon as they finish their development and approve the quality, they are responsible for any failures - which can save us a lot of money, too.
I agree completely. It's not something you want to botch up. I think it's the right choice here, and not just because of the RMAs.
However, I still want to know why (and what the nub company says 'why') these weren't tested to spec eight months ago (or however long it was), when all of the nubs were ready and waiting ... for the boards to be populated (and cases to put them in.
EvilDragon said:
Me neither. But for me, each little step is a good step nowadays.
Just like they have been for the past two years, right?
EvilDragon said:
They've been shipped on Wednesday (which is just a few hours ago), I don't follow the flight neither do I personally have any idea on which plane it went.
That's something Craig would probably know, as he is the guy getting the cases - but I guess they're currently lying around at customs.
Umm, what? "quote name='EvilDragon' timestamp='1285809850'"
My handy-dandy unixtime converter:
http://www.onlineconversion.com/unix_time.htm
Tells me that 1285809850 is Thu, 30 Sep 2010 01:24:10 GMT, or Thu, 30 Sep 2010 16:44:31 in Hong Kong (not sure where in China the factory is).
You'd said that the cases whould probably still be landing on Wednesday, because of the time zone changes: http://boards.openpandora.org/index.php?/topic/254-birthplace-of-a-pandora-board-and-a-power-loss-2010-09-16/page__st__40__p__5669#entry5669
I'm not sure how to interpret your latest post about them - http://boards.openpandora.org/index.php?/topic/350-the-day-after-shipping-cases-2010-09-30/page__p__6041#entry6041
Where does the forwarder live? In China, or the UK? Because I hope he didn't *just* send them on the way from China...
And while we're on the subject of cases:
DaveC's comments about simple mould changes makes me sad. Also:
http://www.gp32x.de/board/index.php?/topic/56788-is-there-a-problem/page__view__findpost__p__919872