TeDaDeS
Forum Addict!
Iran is almost like the size of Europe. Israel invaded Gaza, which is way smaller, even occupying it with ground forces and that didn't solve the problem.
I think for Israel it's a checklist of enemies they can hurt, and for the US it's disabling a China-allied and oil-providing country with the additional benefit of isolating Russia.
If there ever will be a direct confrontation between China and the US, I think the US just prepared itself to have an advantage so they would win. Mitigating the risk of it ever coming to a confrontation in the first place.
What should they do with the Iranian people to convince them they should change without killing them?
Or can they stay who they are, but with a smaller army and a new leader. Not having a nuclear bomb else they get attacked again.
I also don't know what the US's plan is regarding this, but to me your story implies more is needed, which would probably result in even more deaths.
Not starting a war, and not doing anything also results in deaths apparently. So, it's bad either way, and it looks like the US feels more comfortable in trying something. Even though trying something might be a poor plan.
I think for Israel it's a checklist of enemies they can hurt, and for the US it's disabling a China-allied and oil-providing country with the additional benefit of isolating Russia.
If there ever will be a direct confrontation between China and the US, I think the US just prepared itself to have an advantage so they would win. Mitigating the risk of it ever coming to a confrontation in the first place.
Usually wars are fought by only a small percentage of the people in a country (like, 5% or so). The rest of them can become collateral damage.But in the end, just like in the Ukraine-Russia war it's mostly ordinary people who just want to have a happy normal life getting killed by other people in the same situation for the profit of a few rich and powerful people who're profiting off the war, no matter who eventually "wins".
Didn't they perform an ethnic cleaning of the Germans after the second world war to educate the German people what their country did was wrong?Yeah, it's so obvious all those million people so morally wrong will now be convinced that those foreigners who leave them without fresh water to drink and clean air to breathe, bomb their schools and kill civilians are the righteous knights than can and will save their country from depravation and will build them a disneyworld out of their immense generosity. They are all so much closer to happiness and joy now. They don't even have to decide anything, debate a constitution or elect a parliament, just relax on the ruins of your house until Trump designates your king or viceroy or governor, or whatever it is (no califa in any case) and Netanyahu parachutes your puppet MPs. Now that they won't be able to afford a burka they'll be overjoyed to learn they no longer need to wear one. Pity they can't afford a shirt and jeans either. But, hey, who cares when you can blissfully starve satisfied that your former tyrants are no more. How do you say Dollar is the greatest in Farsi ?
What should they do with the Iranian people to convince them they should change without killing them?
Or can they stay who they are, but with a smaller army and a new leader. Not having a nuclear bomb else they get attacked again.
I also don't know what the US's plan is regarding this, but to me your story implies more is needed, which would probably result in even more deaths.
Not starting a war, and not doing anything also results in deaths apparently. So, it's bad either way, and it looks like the US feels more comfortable in trying something. Even though trying something might be a poor plan.
