The Communication Cube


They already were making the choice of killing or injuring humans, some (many?) of which where so forced to be there as the donkeys are. I'm not sure the particular species of the victim matters that much.
I mean: I understand you, that deciding whether to destroy an enemy drone is a much easier question than deciding whether t odestroy a enemy human or an enemy donkey.
But they were already destroying manned vehicles with its crew, so they're sadly beyond that point.
They'll blow up donkeys for sure, but I wonder if they'll blow them up on purpose like they do with abandoned transportation (like trucks, quads, motorcycles, etc).
I don't think mechanophilia is common under drone operators, but I could imagine even a regular operator might question blowing up a donkey on purpose (at least the first time doing it).

And the existing AI models used existing human works (code, books, web pages...) to train the models. Often without proper permission. And those human authors used the whole humanity as teachers. So the cost of the USA models should also be higher than stated.

It's funny how OpenAI, DeepSeek and all choose to draw the lines where they please.
If I rename Deepseek to Dontseek and offer it stating it only costs me $1 to create I don't think I'll cause AI stocks to crash. The reason the crash occurred was because Deepseek hinted at doing an identical job as OpenAI but only needing a fraction of hardware and costs.
If Deepseek used humanities build-up knowledge published online, like OpenAI did, they would also need way more resources compared to what they needed now. OpenAI will probably block them from using their services causing Deepseek to not be able to reproduce their trick.
The end result, a public LLM, is great for us consumers. So no complaints there.
 
The first Asterix Volume will now get translated to Ukrainian which is quite a good sign ..

I do plan to use the Asterix Comics as some sort of an Motivation Bait for my book reading : after every book I finish, I read one Asterix Comic ^^
 
They'll blow up donkeys for sure, but I wonder if they'll blow them up on purpose like they do with abandoned transportation (like trucks, quads, motorcycles, etc).
I guess they'll do. Unless they can safely steal them, or rescue them or call it what you will.
I suppose the ideal outcome would be the destruction of any fence or rope holding the donkeys with enough frightening bang that they escape. But I don't see it as likely.

I don't think mechanophilia is common under drone operators, but I could imagine even a regular operator might question blowing up a donkey on purpose (at least the first time doing it).
You're right there. Targeting an empty donkey is a different decision than an empty manned vehicle.

If I rename Deepseek to Dontseek and offer it stating it only costs me $1 to create I don't think I'll cause AI stocks to crash. The reason the crash occurred was because Deepseek hinted at doing an identical job as OpenAI but only needing a fraction of hardware and costs.
If Deepseek used humanities build-up knowledge published online, like OpenAI did, they would also need way more resources compared to what they needed now. OpenAI will probably block them from using their services causing Deepseek to not be able to reproduce their trick.
The end result, a public LLM, is great for us consumers. So no complaints there.
That's an interpretation.
Whatever the business model for DeepSeek, it doesn't seem to imply stopping your Dontseek, since it's MIT licensed (I'm not too knowledgeable on this, I just heard so).
OpenAI terms and conditions, on the other hand, prohibit these activities, but they don't seem to have teeth.
Another interpretation is DeepSeek is proving preexisting OpenAI efforts to block "Knowledge distilling" (and enforce their terms) are unsuccessful, so the money those dumb investors put in OpenAI is at risk.
 
So we all agreed that information wants to be free but now that AI's consume it all for profit we change our minds.
 
Back
Top