TeDaDeS
Forum Addict!
They'll blow up donkeys for sure, but I wonder if they'll blow them up on purpose like they do with abandoned transportation (like trucks, quads, motorcycles, etc).They already were making the choice of killing or injuring humans, some (many?) of which where so forced to be there as the donkeys are. I'm not sure the particular species of the victim matters that much.
I mean: I understand you, that deciding whether to destroy an enemy drone is a much easier question than deciding whether t odestroy a enemy human or an enemy donkey.
But they were already destroying manned vehicles with its crew, so they're sadly beyond that point.
I don't think mechanophilia is common under drone operators, but I could imagine even a regular operator might question blowing up a donkey on purpose (at least the first time doing it).
If I rename Deepseek to Dontseek and offer it stating it only costs me $1 to create I don't think I'll cause AI stocks to crash. The reason the crash occurred was because Deepseek hinted at doing an identical job as OpenAI but only needing a fraction of hardware and costs.And the existing AI models used existing human works (code, books, web pages...) to train the models. Often without proper permission. And those human authors used the whole humanity as teachers. So the cost of the USA models should also be higher than stated.
It's funny how OpenAI, DeepSeek and all choose to draw the lines where they please.
If Deepseek used humanities build-up knowledge published online, like OpenAI did, they would also need way more resources compared to what they needed now. OpenAI will probably block them from using their services causing Deepseek to not be able to reproduce their trick.
The end result, a public LLM, is great for us consumers. So no complaints there.