FluffyPanda posted on Feb 23 2006 at 02:18 PM said:And the second processor just happens to have a 4k cache of its own... I wonder how much memory squidgesnes actually needs assigned at one time for graphics / music.Radek posted on Feb 22 2006 at 08:55 PM said:Please look at the Nintendo64 - it has only 4K for its texture cache (when mipmapping really only 2K) and it's main cpu cann't access memory directly.
Maybe it would be possible to cache an entire sound effect bank and have audio play moved to the second chip?
FluffyPanda posted on Feb 23 2006 at 02:18 PM said:Regardless, I'm still confident that the second cpu will prove very useful once we've run out of single processor optimisations.
Deed posted on Feb 23 2006 at 06:52 AM said:You should consider lucky someone dares to reply to your constantly pointless posts ...
Radek posted on Feb 23 2006 at 02:11 PM said:For snes it could be difficult because it's pcm based (so it has to access memory for sound generation) however if emulated machine is using pure synth (like C64, AtariST, Gameboy and many others) the whole code could fit into a cache and would fill a audio buffer lets say of 2048 bytes (stereo 44KHz 16 bit) then dump it at once when ready. Wait... isn't snes using adpcm compression for samples (with 4 bit encoded samples)? If so the bandwith needs shouldn't be big at all and assuming loading in a bulk 8x256x4bits ("8x" for every snes' channel) ADPCM stream would need only 1K of memory. Then decompress it, mix, add effects/filter and write results back to the memory.
It's important to process data in the bulks whenever possible so efficiency of memory transfers could be maximized.
DaveC posted on Feb 23 2006 at 03:07 PM said:Deed posted on Feb 23 2006 at 06:52 AM said:You should consider lucky someone dares to reply to your constantly pointless posts ...
And your reply here wasn't totaly pointless?
What a dickhead.
DaveC, Skeptical? Never :rolleyes:DaveC posted on Feb 23 2006 at 07:22 AM said:I admire your optimism. Still I am skeptical. I will believe it when I see it.
No opinion is valid if it is incorrect.mattyrb posted on Feb 23 2006 at 02:19 PM said:Leave DaveC alone.....his opinion is as valid as anyone else
Hanz™ posted on Feb 23 2006 at 07:00 PM said:No opinion is valid if it is incorrect.mattyrb posted on Feb 23 2006 at 02:19 PM said:Leave DaveC alone.....his opinion is as valid as anyone else
Edit: DaveC guru?! I would have to leave.
I think that's perfectly valid. He's done so much with the stick, and improved that rubbish LCD thingHanz™ posted on Feb 23 2006 at 07:00 PM said:Edit: DaveC guru?! I would have to leave.
But hes not a guru yet?!nickspoon posted on Feb 23 2006 at 08:06 PM said:I think that's perfectly valid. He's done so much with the stick, and improved that rubbish LCD thingHanz™ posted on Feb 23 2006 at 07:00 PM said:Edit: DaveC guru?! I would have to leave.
Sure, that's not the reason why most gurus on here are gurus, but hey, we need a change once in a while.
Who's with me? *tumbleweed*
Oh, and go on then. Leave.
Hanz™ posted on Feb 23 2006 at 07:09 PM said:But hes not a guru yet?!nickspoon posted on Feb 23 2006 at 08:06 PM said:I think that's perfectly valid. He's done so much with the stick, and improved that rubbish LCD thingHanz™ posted on Feb 23 2006 at 07:00 PM said:Edit: DaveC guru?! I would have to leave.
Sure, that's not the reason why most gurus on here are gurus, but hey, we need a change once in a while.
Who's with me? *tumbleweed*
Oh, and go on then. Leave.
And oh. I would probably not leave just change username or something.
Nah. I am completely worthless.DaveC posted on Feb 23 2006 at 08:17 PM said:Hanz™ posted on Feb 23 2006 at 07:09 PM said:But hes not a guru yet?!nickspoon posted on Feb 23 2006 at 08:06 PM said:I think that's perfectly valid. He's done so much with the stick, and improved that rubbish LCD thingHanz™ posted on Feb 23 2006 at 07:00 PM said:Edit: DaveC guru?! I would have to leave.
Sure, that's not the reason why most gurus on here are gurus, but hey, we need a change once in a while.
Who's with me? *tumbleweed*
Oh, and go on then. Leave.
And oh. I would probably not leave just change username or something.
Hanz, you are always quick to flame and attack. That is all that you really do though that is the problem. I mean WHAT have you actually done to help the community? Have you improved something? have you made anything? maybe some art or useful utility?
Or do you just jump on the flame war bandwagon every chance you get? You are useless I with you WOULD leave.
nickspoon posted on Feb 23 2006 at 02:06 PM said:I think that's perfectly valid. He's done so much with the stick, and improved that rubbish LCD thingHanz™ posted on Feb 23 2006 at 07:00 PM said:Edit: DaveC guru?! I would have to leave.
Sure, that's not the reason why most gurus on here are gurus, but hey, we need a change once in a while.
Who's with me? *tumbleweed*
Oh, and go on then. Leave.
DijiTao posted on Feb 23 2006 at 02:12 PM said:ha, good point about stick - sure I'm jumping on the bandwangon! DaveC for Guru!
*another tumbleweed rolls by*