Well, we'd need at least 1600 orders for the Premium version to be able to sell it for the wholesale prices.
ADDITIONAL orders to the normal version orders.
ADDITIONAL orders to the normal version orders.
How about if the Premium version retailed for €550?Well, we'd need at least 1600 orders for the Premium version to be able to sell it for the wholesale prices.
ADDITIONAL orders to the normal version orders.
If the demand for a premium version at €575 was sufficient to 'subsidise' the cost of a base unit. My suspicion is that a lot of computing products are sold this way. I can see many reasons why this might, or might not, work for Pyra. I'm not saying 'this is what you should do' what I'm saying is 'find out if this would make sense'.how do you plan do sell it for 475 EUR?
And I can barely keep the base version at 500 EUR (I've already cut more profit than I should and hope to sell more units to get the production costs back), how do you plan do sell it for 475 EUR?
If the demand for a premium version at €575 was sufficient to 'subsidise' the cost of a base unit. My suspicion is that a lot of computing products are sold this way. I can see many reasons why this might, or might not, work for Pyra. I'm not saying 'this is what you should do' what I'm saying is 'find out if this would make sense'.
Regardless the version, we need to produce and sell at least 1600
Does that also apply to the 4G version? If not, why not?
Surely the required sales number is based on the markup that people are willing to pay for, for instance to use an absurd example : the retail price for a Premium Pyra was set at €1000 and there were 400 pre orders for the premium version & 1200 pre orders for the base version at €500. Would this not make a Premium Pyra financially viable?
Surely the required sales number is based on the markup that people are willing to pay for, for instance to use an absurd example : the retail price for a Premium Pyra was set at €1000 and there were 400 pre orders for the premium version & 1200 pre orders for the base version at €500. Would this not make a Premium Pyra financially viable?
Yes, of course, something like that would work. However, that's not easy to handle.
What would you do if you don't get the 400 preorders for 1000€?
Refund everything?
The minimum order quantity for the eMMC chips is 1600, so if we want a 64GB and a 16GB variant, we need to buy 3200.
The MOQ for the 4G module is 500.
So, to make this work with an estimated (maximum) 5% fail rate, you will need to sell, more or less,
Euro spec 4G units in multiples of 475.
US spec 4G units in multiples of 475.
Net Euro+US+no4G units in multiples of 1440.
Euro 4G sale # 476 dictates another 500 Euro spec 4G modules. Unit 1441 dictates another 1600 eMMC modules.
I'm sure every individual part with it's individual MOQ and it's individual lead time has to be less than fun to keep track of.
May you sell so many of them that the MOQ of any given component becomes irrelevant.
Tell them that they get their money back if not enough preorders are made (maybe minus some money transfer fees) ?And then if you only get 380 orders, what do you do?
From the bugs and calculations news post ED stated that 1500+ is what he'd like to sell as this is the number required to ensure that future sales could be from stock rather than via pre order.I wonder what EDs sales projections are.
Yes, of course, something like that would work. However, that's not easy to handle.
What would you do if you don't get the 400 preorders for 1000€?
Refund everything?
Except that ED will be taking pre-orders, so at least for the initial production run he'll know approximately how many he'll need of each. If he got say 650 pre-orders for one or the other would he not be able to purchase an intermediate amount (eg 700) to cover the production?
-Neelix
Quite a few of you have cried for a 4GB version, and we MIGHT be able to provide one.
When we started, there only were 512MB versions of the RAM chip available that we're using for the OMAP5.
Now there's also a 1GB version available, and if we're using 4 of them, that would add up to 4GB RAM.
And for the 2GB version, we would only use two of those chips
That would have some advantages:
* Two 1GB chips will probably be a few EUR cheaper than four 512MB chips (though this is marginal)
* Two chips will probably use less power than four chips, and every mW of power we can save is useful.
* Both the 4GB and 2GB CPU board would use the same RAM chips, which means we wouldn't need to buy different types of chips but just populate two or four of them. This is REALLY helpful for the MOQ (Minimum order quantity) and for an easy production run.
However, take this info with a grain of salt right now.
We first have to check whether the OMAP5 works with only two memory chips instead of four, and we need to make sure maintaining both versions here is not a lot of work.
What we also don't know yet is whether we'll offer the 4GB as an optional upgrade or include it with the 4G version. It'll become pretty complex for the production run if we have so many different version.
Of course, once we'll know more, I'll let you know.