whiskthecat
whiskthecat
gavie said:
Last edited by a moderator:
Psp Emulation
- Thread starter TheLonelyGod
- Start date
God Ginrai
Godmaster
I beg to differ. playable N64 emulation is definitely possible. And fullspeed might be possible, if we have some good optimization done. As far as compatibility goes, that has nothing to do with if it is possible to emulate a system or not.gavie said:
-God Ginrai
Last edited by a moderator:
TyBO!
Member
No. Dreamcast emulation will not happen.
PSP emulation will not happen.
PS2 emulation will not happen.
I hate to be such a downer, but so much of this thread is just wishful thinking.
PSP emulation will not happen.
PS2 emulation will not happen.
I hate to be such a downer, but so much of this thread is just wishful thinking.
JakeK
Active Member
You don't think half of us know this? No need to repeat the obvious. It has been stated before anyway.
StealthBagel
Member
- Joined
- Oct 17, 2007
- Messages
- 251
MHz is in no way a measure of performance..... I can't believe how many people don't realize this. Otherwise, why have PC processors become so much more powerful while barely approaching 3 GHz, while the last generation approached 4 and was slower? They had less cores, less advanced microarchitectures, you'd be comparing apples and oranges. MHz is a rate of CLOCK FREQUENCY ONLY and has nothing to do with performance except comparing the exact same processor in the exact same operating environment....
As for Dreamcast, PS2 and PSP emulation? If you're happy with framerates measured in "Frames Per Century".... have fun.
As for Dreamcast, PS2 and PSP emulation? If you're happy with framerates measured in "Frames Per Century".... have fun.
quartercast
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 13, 2007
- Messages
- 1,551
Gaeryc said:
Last edited by a moderator:
atomicthumbs
I am the king of the collectors, with hospital bed
quartercast said:
Last edited by a moderator:
efegea
Active Member
I wonder how doesthe pandora cpu compare to the xbox cpu, because una-i, one of the developers of the "chankast" emulator, said he tried to port it to the xbox and got sonic adventure running at 20 of 30 fps, and that without optimizing..
Exophase
Nothing good will ever come of Exophase.
But Chankast was optimized for x86 in the first place, and hardware-wise XBox is really just a PC.efegea said:
At 600MHz Pandora's CPU won't stack up against XBox's, it's a more sophisticated CPU with a higher clock rate, even ignoring the ways x86 holds it back.
And I wouldn't play Sonic Adventure at 20-30fps (we're talking out of 60, right?)
EDIT: Would like to see a source on this (Chankast performance on XBox), I can't find anything and I'm starting to think it's just a rumor.
Last edited by a moderator:
StealthBagel
Member
- Joined
- Oct 17, 2007
- Messages
- 251
Chankast didn't run that well on a 2 Ghz+ Athlon 64, so I doubt it ran at 20-30 FPS on a ~600 MHz P3 Celeron... either way in my experience its compatibility is low compared to NullDC so it's really not the correct choice to port anyway, were DC emulation on Pandora possible at a decent speed, which it's not.
#1 GameMaster
Member
atomicthumbs said:quartercast said:Gaeryc said:TheLonelyGod said:Gaeryc said:pon pon pata ponTheLonelyGod said:
chaka chaka pata pon
Don dodon dodon
Pon pokko pon pon
DAH DO DAH C-C-C-COMBO BREAKER
Are you guys talking about the game for PSP Patapon that seems like a game that somone could easily make for the Pandora or at least similar to it because that game is OK.
Last edited by a moderator:
Squidge
Certified Guru
Last time I tried Chankast, it ran Sonic at full speed. The only problem is that the audio kept muting and you had to restart the emu to get it back.
tkeely4777
Still Fresh
- Joined
- Dec 15, 2005
- Messages
- 93
squeakypants said:
Last edited by a moderator:
x68000
Mega GP Mania
I'm sure that they could only get Chankast running at around 2-3 fps on the xbox private beta!
Anyway, if 20-30 was possible, it would have been close enough considering the original game's dire framerate (25-30fps max, despite Sega promising a constant 60fps!)
Anyway, if 20-30 was possible, it would have been close enough considering the original game's dire framerate (25-30fps max, despite Sega promising a constant 60fps!)
atomicthumbs
I am the king of the collectors, with hospital bed
more like applets and oranges :lol:Stealth Bagel said:
Last edited by a moderator:
efegea
Active Member
http://gp32spain.com/foros/showpost.php?p=...p;postcount=148Exophase said:
Last edited by a moderator:
Rivroner
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jun 4, 2006
- Messages
- 1,106
efegea said:http://gp32spain.com/foros/showpost.php?p=...p;postcount=148Exophase said:
Como no se lo traduzcas...
De todas formas lo dije yo ayer en el hilo de Dreamcast que hay abierto.
Last edited by a moderator:
efegea
Active Member
El dijo una fuente, pues toma fuente... :rolleyes:Rivroner said:Como no se lo traduzcas...
De todas formas lo dije yo ayer en el hilo de Dreamcast que hay abierto.
Last edited by a moderator:
Exophase
Nothing good will ever come of Exophase.
efegea said:
Last edited by a moderator:
StealthBagel
Member
- Joined
- Oct 17, 2007
- Messages
- 251
Then you should expect it to run at 12.5 - 15 FPS; if it was overstressing the DC hardware due to inefficient design and the Pandora can't run Dreamcast emulation even remotely near full speed (IT CAN'T), it would experience the same difficulties compounded....x68000 said:
But it's a moot point. Dreamcast emulation will always run like shit on such hardware and there isn't a way around it. I'd be impressed if you achieved >1-3 FPS honestly.
Last edited by a moderator:
