fischju2000
Active Member
- Joined
- Oct 1, 2008
- Messages
- 763
If it had a high def outlet, I might. It would certainly be a good backup and control system, with many additional possibilites for portable computing.
I have always thought that one of the advantages of ARM is its low power consumption... if you have a standalone unit that isn't really necessary.
Unless you care about mains power consumption. You know, carbon emissions, the planet, boring things like that.
I agree with this alone. Youcould very well actually use the board you have now, add in the controls and still have a decent controller that ouputs to a TV maybe even keep the SDHC ports. Although maybe include a USB hub since multiplayer games with everyones controller plugged into a built in port on the hosts controller might be awkward., include two extra shoulder buttons on the "cube" part so it can be used by itself as a controller for TV-Out gaming. The cube itself would really be a smooth quadrilateral the size of a complete Pandora that you can still fit into a pocket.
[/B]
I agree the locked-out GPU is a problem (though on Pandora, we're relying on Imgtec good will to provide us with something usable).On the downside, Linux is unable to access the GPU on that system and its media codec support is terrible, especially for HD media that doesn't come on a BluRay disc.
Would you be interested in a Pandora cube, which would essentially be a Pandora for the home which would be a Pandora board in a small box with a TV out cable.
You would have to attach your own controls/hub via USB.
You would have access to the same software, emulators, media players etc. only via the TV screen.
It would be around $200-$220.
Opinions?
I voted "No" for the simple reason that I bought a device that seems to meet all these specs last year - a Pandora with the TV-Out cable etc.It would just use the Pandora board as is, there isn't any extra work required, we are just trying to open our potential market a bit more so we might become profitable a little faster.