Now that we have a price point for the i.MX31 and some comparisons to the MMSP2+, it'd be interesting to see a price point for the OMAP34x0 and a quick comparison with the i.MX31.
As far as I can see, the OMAP34x0 has an edge in it's OpenGL ES 2.0 support while the MMSP2+ has only OpenGL ES 1.1, but I can't seem to find a specification as to which level is supported by the i.MX31. Hopefully 2.0 but who can tell? Also the OMAP34x0 use a 65nm process, which might cause it to be even better than the i.MX31 in terms of power consumption?
I would guess that most potential SoC's use the Chrontel 7024 for TV encoding (at least the i.MX31 does), which would mean S-video is the best we can get unless the TV-out can be implemented off-SoC.
That being said, whichever of the three "most wanted" chips discussed here actually ends up in the console, I'll be happy.
Squidge said:
StarG said:
Directly asked: any chance to see a SGX accelerator inside the new handheld, possibly as an added IC ? You seemed to gotten some better thread to the developing team and might ask them.
I don't even know what SGX is :blink:
He's probably talking about
this. Looks neat, it appears to be the "top of the line" among the PowerVR family, targetted at "Next-generation mainstream and performance mobile platforms".
EDIT: Dunno which one is integrated in the various chips discussed here, though. A comparison chart would be nice.
Yes, that assumption was correct. After a somewhat perilous search i could not find any source noting a standalone accelerator ic, so i guess the only confirmed model is actually the TI model which is as was stated before unavailable (because of volume restrictions). Other ic's (including from Intel in '08) might ship this year but thats most probably too late for a console that is rumored to appear at the end of this year.