Swordfish II
Advanced Member
- Joined
- May 20, 2015
- Messages
- 1,175
Not boring plain, and, more importantly, not an eyesore.
Eh I prefer function over form. LXDE or XFCE will be my go to regardless of what it ships with
Not boring plain, and, more importantly, not an eyesore.
Recent tests I've seen suggest XFCE has bloated quite successfully over the years since the Pandora, such that at least in terms of RAM usage that I saw last, Mate outperforms XFCE these days.Eh I prefer function over form. LXDE or XFCE will be my go to regardless of what it ships with
ED needs something to read while he's opening and closing and opening and closing his Pyra...What does the DE have to do with the news post anyway?
Eh I prefer function over form.
First of, unlike planned, I have NOT contacted any of the Protoype orderers yet. Sorry for that.
There are two reasons for that: I first wanted to make sure that enough prototypes are there for devs and second: I simply didn't have the time to write the needed informations for the preorderers.
I hope to find some time for that during GamesCom. But right now, only mainboards with bad wifi reception are available - so that's something you'd need to cope with.
But, as promised when you ordered, I will send you a fixed mainboard once they're available in case you still want one of those prototypes.
I suspect that the tests you saw were not between Mate and Xfce, but between a Mate version of a distribution and an Xfce version, which each had whichever customisations the distribution makers saw fit to add. I'm guessing that you wouldn't see the same figures in a comparison between Debian Xfce and Debian Mate. I could be mistaken, of course. Perhaps you are referring to a test that used Debian. What makes me suspect not, however, is how little difference there is between Debian with Xfce and Debian with Pekwm or Openbox.Recent tests I've seen suggest XFCE has bloated quite successfully over the years since the Pandora, such that at least in terms of RAM usage that I saw last, Mate outperforms XFCE these days.
Common on many webpages, because the first thing user should see must be ads, these are in better contrast. I found that proprietary software going this way also tends to end as adware.Putting grey text on a grey background seems to be a favourite folly.
Not sure what this had to do with desktop themes, but just in case: that is exactly what I am getting at. If it is difficult to work with, like starting into a light, or headaches caused due to stupid color choices, or things vanishing because the text remains black instead of white even though you changed things around(white on white also a problem, probably a bigger one because of the other things I mentioned).Eh I prefer function over form. LXDE or XFCE will be my go to regardless of what it ships with
In some instances there are simple logical reasons for it (go with greys instead of wasting more time trying to fix everything). I also tried finding other colour combinations to go with dark grey. It is difficult to get just right, so I often go with pure green. It doesn't bother my peepers too much, even if it is a bit tacky looking, and it is usually much quicker/easier than playing around to get it all good, especially the greys.Putting grey text on a grey background seems to be a favourite folly.
This makes me think of the various green phosphor themes that imitate the look of an old "green screen" monitor.It is difficult to get just right, so I often go with pure green. It doesn't bother my peepers too much, even if it is a bit tacky looking, and it is usually much quicker/easier than playing around to get it all good, especially the greys.
Not sure what this had to do with desktop themes, but just in case: that is exactly what I am getting at. If it is difficult to work with, like starting into a light, or headaches caused due to stupid color choices, or things vanishing because the text remains black instead of white even though you changed things around(white on white also a problem, probably a bigger one because of the other things I mentioned).
.
Yeah, that was the same kind of look I was going for way back when I first did it. It turned out that it worked better than a lot of other options against a black background (pure red and blue at full blast bother my eyes). One of the best colors for me, other than a neutral light grey, is a dull orange, almost like a low intensity amber mono monitor.This makes me think of the various green phosphor themes that imitate the look of an old "green screen" monitor.
It didn't seem to fit with what I was talking about in what you quoted. I will probably go with KDE, TDE, or maybe CDE as my default DE. If Mate is what ships as the default I will check that out, and stick with it if it lets me make the changes I want and I can get certain tools I normally use with KDE. If I go for something a bit lighter it will probably be Xfce, due to familiarity and some decent options I like.Where did it come from? The pages of discussion and stats on DEs after we found out what the prototypes had. Just scroll up this page and you can see some.
Just throwing in my 2 cents.
It can suck for sure. The dark themes included in the Pandora GUI all have issues, mainly undetectable scroll buttons or weird colour decissions like white text over white input fields (google search for example) in a overall dark theme...The problem with the included dark ones it's they almost always suck and can be literally headache inducing. Sure, they have been included with OSs for 20+ years, but they usually feel like someone trying to check a box (dark theme, yep) rather than increase usability. I would have to go look at what was included on the Pandora to give specific issues, and maybe there are even done that would have been ok, although I know I spent so much time working everything out that I eventually copied my stuff over to one of my SD cards so that I could save time later.
This makes me think of the various green phosphor themes that imitate the look of an old "green screen" monitor.