Hippo
Still Fresh
I greatly appreciate your mature reply. A response in this manner is extremely uncommon on this forum. Of course you are fully entitled to your views on the issue, as am I to my own. I will reciprocate your statement in that I hope my remarks did not strike you as a personal attack of any sort.
Not at all, I've swam around the internet long enough to know not to take forum posting to heart.
I believe I'll give this a shot. I will say, however, that since GP32X is the largest avenue of communication regarding the GP2X in Europe, the US and Australia (potentially the world), making public the wrongdoing against consumers in such a public light may work better than attempting to make a case with a government organization that probably has much larger and significant work to be concerned with, and would likely not give the issue the time of day. (If I am wrong about this bit, my apologies.) At any rate, I doubt the majority of offenses commited by GPH/Craig/GBAX could be considered 'criminal', but still harm the consumer and should be made public knowledge nonetheless.
I agree that making you beliefs known here on GP2X means it will reach possibly the largest audience of potential and current GP2X owners on the internet. False advertising and other problems you mention are considered law breaking here in the UK.
Trading Standards has a sister arm so to speak called Consumer Direct, this is who you should take the matter up with. The URL's are:
http://www.tradingstandards.gov.uk/
http://www.consumerdirect.gov.uk/
This URL covers the false advertising bit.
Last edited by a moderator: