How is this worrying? It's a rig to quickly test the nubs, not the way they're going to be in the ready versions.ljones said:Looking at the picture above (of the control wired to the main board) it looks intresting, but a bit worrying. It looks a bit .... experimental with the wires soldered across. Isn't that a bit concerning (esp. if the pandoa is only months away)?
ljones
Looks like an atmel mcu, so as long as you have access to the programming pins on the processor, I'd have to say it's upgradable. Hardly user friendly though and I wouldn't want to access the programming pins via the main OS (think viruses destroying your nub firmware).wermy said:Just curious (and sorry if this has been discussed before): Is the nub firmware user-upgradeable after the nub is installed on the board? Just in case some more bugs surface...
That should be unlikely... according to MWeston and the Nubs Testing, they are now "Jitter Free".wermy said:Just in case some more bugs surface...
No jitterbug on the Pandora?gp2.eXe said:That should be unlikely... according to MWeston and the Nubs Testing, they are now "Jitter Free".wermy said:Just in case some more bugs surface...
Squidge said:Looks like an atmel mcu, so as long as you have access to the programming pins on the processor, I'd have to say it's upgradable. Hardly user friendly though and I wouldn't want to access the programming pins via the main OS (think viruses destroying your nub firmware).wermy said:Just curious (and sorry if this has been discussed before): Is the nub firmware user-upgradeable after the nub is installed on the board? Just in case some more bugs surface...
Therefore user ungradable, probably not. But really, how much is there to test ?
Monk said:Yeah... avoid version 1.0 and version 4.anything
Vorporeal said:Monk said:Yeah... avoid version 1.0 and version 4.anything
You know, Windows NT 4.0 wasn't so bad...