chad78
Active Member
Orkie said:I don't see why you'd want to spoil that nice hardware by throwing Linux on top of it.
That is such a weird thing to read coming from a guy who has Tux as his avatar.
Last edited by a moderator:
Orkie said:I don't see why you'd want to spoil that nice hardware by throwing Linux on top of it.
That is such a weird thing to read coming from a guy who has Tux as his avatar.
Linux is fine, but for such a simple low power system, you may as well use raw HW code (in my opinion anyway).chad78 said:That is such a weird thing to read coming from a guy who has Tux as his avatar.
JSW said:So is this an actual homebrew platform or just something that can be hacked to play homebrew? If it's the former I might buy one to tinker around with, but if it's the latter I really don't see the point.
It's not a homebrew device - its by leapfrog who design 'learning' devices. This ones targetted at 6 to 10 year olds, or should I say this one is targetted at moms to buy for their 6 to 10 year olds because it will have nice gentle games targetted at kids (as PSP and even gba/ds games can be too complicated for 6 year olds).
JSW said:So is this an actual homebrew platform or just something that can be hacked to play homebrew? If it's the former I might buy one to tinker around with, but if it's the latter I really don't see the point.
Exactly!
elan said:True true... It is handheld for small kids... BUT!
IT IS ALSO NEARLY 400MHZ ARM9 PLUS 3D OPENGL 1.1ES HANDHELD FOR 90USD!!! :blink:
So why not???It is not homebrew yet... To make it homebrew is point of this topic
I agree - I was only answering a specific question, ie it was not primarily designed for homebrew.
As Chad has said, any device seems to be a homebrew device these days - some are just 'harder work' than others.
For those with kids you can use the excuse its for them and wait until they get bored with it.
Leapfrog is adamant about no thirdparty developers. since the early days of the leapster handheld they have done everything in their power to prevent homebrew development on their devices. i consider their products the "Mt.Everest" of reverse engineering. they obfuscate pcb traces, along with getting custom markings for the IC's they use. i've started a wiki page to document my attempt on getting linux running on the didj, anyone and everyone is well to register there and contribute:DisgruntleElf said:Has anyone contacted the manufacturer and asked about a development kit? Perhaps if the device doesn't sell to their expectation they might consider going in a homebrew direction if they knew there was an interest. Never hurts to try.
prpplague said:Leapfrog is adamant about no thirdparty developers. since the early days of the leapster handheld they have done everything in their power to prevent homebrew development on their devices.
That's probably because some of their software does not look very complicated and I suspect that people would be able to make stuff that put some of theirs to shame.
well there have been some exciting breakthroughs on the Didj device hacking. we have confirmed that the Didj firmware is linux based. the firmware appears to have been built with buildroot, contains uclibc, is eabi based, uses busybox, and a 2.6.20 linux kernel. i've successfully removed the nand flash and dumped it to confirm that the device is loaded with linux. we've also downloaded a firmware update from LeapFrog and confirmed that it has the linux kernel and root filesystems. we've started a page that includes instructions on extracting the image files using a pc running linux:Orkie said:I don't see why you'd want to spoil that nice hardware by throwing Linux on top of it.
i've already made one call to attempt get source, the customer service representative had no information on source code or the availability of it. i've already made contact with the SFLC for them to investigate.Orkie said:Get the source from Leapfrog then.
EDIT: I would be tempted to get involved in this, but I can't afford it right now. Maybe in a few months if it is still going I will get one. Though I don't think it is available in the UK :S.
that is correct, however that doesn't mean they will. it is pretty typical for these types of companies to drag their feet on compliance right up to the point where legal action is imminent. which is why i've been in contact with the SFLC to take care of this right away.Nightwheel said:Well since we now know this thing is linux based. By law, doesn't Leapfrog have to give the source to anyone who asks for?