i hope Quark 2 is already if i get my Pandora, because i have ordered it in November 2008..
Meybe there is a gba emu everywhere..
Meybe there is a gba emu everywhere..
On my way to Korea (Game developers exhibition). The Pandora easily passes through airport security check
matzesu said:@EvilDragon:
How can you Answer Questions in the Forum, when you are on your Way to Korea???
On my way to Korea (Game developers exhibition). The Pandora easily passes through airport security check
nice to hear, the German Airport securitiy has no problem whit a du it youself Linux Gaming Handheld..
Philly said:Its interesting that people expect ALL the emulators to be ready at launch... I had a GP2X (one of the first mark II`s to be sent out) and we had no usable amiga no usable snes, I cant remember about megadrive but even c64 was ropey... mame wasn't playing much and i think nes was reasonable.
Going each day and downloading the latest offerings to see what new emu`s were available was what made that community! I don't remember any whingeing (if that's how you spell it).
It was gratefulness, bug reports and suggestions even some donations... but mainly gratefulness!
Wootson said:I get a little irritated by the fact that people are comparing the Pandora to systems which are already out for several years. And even then, the PSP is no real competition in terms of the basic OS. Because the OS of the PSP is just a simple menu-bar with access to a some very basic options and a store, a media player, a shitty web browser, Skype, and a few other things. Trust me, you can't compare such a simple menu with a total Linux-based OS. The Pandora can theoretically run everything that a normal Linux/Angstrom distribution can run.
It's always the same with these twats who complain all day long about EVERYTHING. I have seen every variation of vaporware-comments here on the boards and on several other websites. And now that the Pandora actually is being build, these very same people are starting to complain that there is no software available at launch. Looking at the list I provided at the beginning of this topic, I can only laugh really hard about their statements.
Now they're complaining that SNES and SMS/MD/CD/32X are not ready. And when those are actually ready they start complaing that ScummVM is not ready. When that is ready they start complaining that PS1 is not ready or not fully optimized. And so on...
Seriously, what a bunch of crybabies! Grab your lollipop and GTFO!
Monk said:Philly said:Its interesting that people expect ALL the emulators to be ready at launch... I had a GP2X (one of the first mark II`s to be sent out) and we had no usable amiga no usable snes, I cant remember about megadrive but even c64 was ropey... mame wasn't playing much and i think nes was reasonable.
Going each day and downloading the latest offerings to see what new emu`s were available was what made that community! I don't remember any whingeing (if that's how you spell it).
It was gratefulness, bug reports and suggestions even some donations... but mainly gratefulness!
I think the reason for the apparent frustration is clear. With the GP2X, people hadn't seen the machine effectively promoted with software that 6, 12, or 18 months later was not in a fit state to download. The problem, I suspect, isn't that the emulators (my fave isn't even mentioned in this thread) aren't ready before the Pandora is released - it's that they aren't ready month and months after they've been "shown working". Combine that with the announcement back in '08 that the Pandora design was done, ready to manufacture, shipped by November or December (08) at latest, and I at least see how people could be puzzled/confused/dissapointed that they won't be able to use the software that possibly convinced them to preorder the device.
This marks a considerable difference from the way the GP2X community evolved. It's all in reverse
PS - I think the software devs concentrating on firmware/OS first is absolutely the right approach. It doesn't stop me seeing how others might be... surprised though.
Philly said:Agreed about the wait for the hardware (who in their right minds would argue) but those rushed ports were a proof of concept to show what it WILL do... it still will some time after launch. The hardware is much improved over what we paid for and the OS is much better than we paid for... My guess is that we are gonna get much better Emulators than those crappy ports.
I do see where people are coming from, but they have always had the option to cancel.
These should be good times... production is immanent!!!
Airport Wifi (or phone tethering) + Pandora handheld FTWMithrildor said:matzesu said:@EvilDragon:
How can you Answer Questions in the Forum, when you are on your Way to Korea???
On my way to Korea (Game developers exhibition). The Pandora easily passes through airport security check
nice to hear, the German Airport securitiy has no problem whit a du it youself Linux Gaming Handheld..
In the age of smarthphones, netbooks and 3G interwebs everything is possible
The "problem" is that people see that it's taken 18 months longer than anticipated, and think that means an extra 18 months to work on stuff.Tripmonkey_uk said:I find it hard to believe that people are complaining that most of the emulators wont be available the second that the Pandora is in their hands. You pre-ordered from the first batch and were told that the software would probably not be spot on or all available from the get go, so what's the problem?
paddy said:ha ,that list is rubbish in my opinion and even if it had most emus avail at launch i would still say the same but this is all becase i have a psp with all that stuff and more already ,i am most looking forward to using the OS more than the emulators and amiga will be very nice but really holding out for n64 and dev games.
Actuly for the development taking soooo long as in nearly 2 years and devs having boards for over a year i find it pretty lame that not all emulators have been ported over ages ago ,just goes to show how much real interest the pandora has ,and what is the deal with snes and megadrive emulators ,they were shown ages ago and stated running over fullspeed yet picodrive will not be out any time soon as notas wants the 32x emulation finished ,well actuly thats fine by me and i can fully understand this but what about snes ? it was said to be fullspeed but when i watched the vids it simply wasn't. (ps ,sorry if i have got this wrong with the amount of time devs have had the dev kits)
Question = can't we just run quick ports via the os instead of pnd's ? i would love zsnes if possible but i don't think it is possible ,ohh and sega fusion.
Emm ,where is the atari jaguar emulator atari lynx & pcengine ? also scumm vm ? is this going to be the trend with pandora that we don't get emus untill they are 100% perfect ,not like it used to be ,i was kinda looking forward to bug reports and actuly helping with the emulators as much as possible ,ohh mabe those emulators that have been held off will be for the store at a price ,if thats the case my pandora will be on ebay shortly after.
One last thing ,i am happy to wait for emus but the points i have raised are simply my thoughts on why it is taking so long to do a basic port ,and how i will be quite sickened by the thought OPT and the authors might possibly want to make money from possible emulators.A good for instance would be the original xbox emulator set all ported over by one man and he done an amazing job ,i think nearly all the emulators were ported by the one guy including well just about everything apart from n64 as that was done by someone else, so atari lynx ,c64 ,dosbox, amiga psx snes megadrive/segacd 32x and the list goes on and on ,it can't be that difficult ,i am no dev that is for sure but in fact if the store starts selling the more popular emus it will make me learn and port them my self free of charge.
Wootson said:Seriously, this is the last comment I'm ever going to make about this, because the subject is just utterly crap and full of troll bait.