Definitively a good explanation.If you want to release a device with the latest hardware, you have three options:
1. Be a big company with a lot of weight (or that makes its own hardware) so that you can prototype and develop low-level software while the hardware is still in prototyping phases.
2. Buy an off-the-shelf smartphone from a Chinese company.
3. Get lucky and get a partnership with a big brand to test their latest hardware... But even then, you've got a huge risk of getting behind and releasing later than big companies. (See Pandora that was supposed to be the first device with an OMAP3)
There are many over-optimists people making companies or kickstarter projects for a phone with all the latest fancy hardware. They figure they just have to buy it from the manufacturers, put them together and insert them in a 3D printed case. And then they hit the real world, and the product gets delayed or even canceled as the price rises and the feature list shorten. And finally you have a device that's expensive, outdated and buggy.
What do you consider "powerful hardware" if not the "latest"? My Amiga 600 was powerful hardware - compared to my Commodore 64.I don't want the latest hardware, just a powerful hardware
It was powerful even compared to the machines released in its own generation. It crushed all the PCs and Macs of the time (up until late 80s - early 90s), and it was certainly superior to the Atari ST and 1040 for graphics and sound. There was nothing like it.My Amiga 600 was powerful hardware - compared to my Commodore 64.
This is a round-about way of saying thank you ED for making such a kick-ass machine available to people. You are never going to completely satisfy everybody but you have gotten very close for a lot of us. I appreciate that you have satisfied my needs and I believe that I am not alone in my appreciation.
The Acorn Archimedes was released in 1987 processing 4 MIPS and putting out up to 256 colours (which the Amiga could beat using HAM to be fair, but only in relatively static scenes as I understand it).It was powerful even compared to the machines released in its own generation. It crushed all the PCs and Macs of the time (up until late 80s - early 90s), and it was certainly superior to the Atari ST and 1040 for graphics and sound. There was nothing like it.My Amiga 600 was powerful hardware - compared to my Commodore 64.
As I understand it, there weren't too many computers that were present in large numbers on both sides of the Atlantic between the late 70s and early 90s. I only personally know of one or two people that had British computers in the US back then (ZX80, I think), and everyone else was using something from an American company. I think Commodore was one of the exceptions to this, having products that were fairly popular in Europe and North America. Feel free to correct me and fill in any gaps in my knowledge.Also, its games market was kind of still-born, not being a major success in America.
I would guess that one factor - besides being crusaders on a mission of course - is the repetitiveness of it. As Klumpen alludes to above, more or less this exact thread tends to pop up every 3 months or so, and in the end some of the more temporally advanced board dwellers tend to lose their temper a bit.
Which is a bit unfair to every new person asking the same question, but still. I do get the same urge, sometimes, when I'm grading exams. By the 35th identical error I tend to want to write "I've already told you that is wrong!!! Why do you keep making the same error!!!" It takes great effort to remember that it is actually different students behind every exam
If so many of them are making the same mistakes have you considered that the problem might be you? (I tease, I tease)I do get the same urge, sometimes, when I'm grading exams. By the 35th identical error I tend to want to write "I've already told you that is wrong!!! Why do you keep making the same error!!!"
Yeah, the Commodore machines and to a certain extent, Atari machines were successful in Europe (well, Britain at least). We also had the Spectrum, Amstrad machines, and BBC micros (plus various also-rans, from Dragon on down). Makes me wonder sometimes what else the Americans had for 8-bit machines; little old blightey had five major makes, America must've had more than those two and the TRS-80/Co-co (though I guess America was also into consoles in a bigger way than we seemed to be back then).As I understand it, there weren't too many computers that were present in large numbers on both sides of the Atlantic between the late 70s and early 90s. I only personally know of one or two people that had British computers in the US back then (ZX80, I think), and everyone else was using something from an American company. I think Commodore was one of the exceptions to this, having products that were fairly popular in Europe and North America. Feel free to correct me and fill in any gaps in my knowledge.
Did you ever had to review code for an exam It was an oral exam and some of the students had the exact same code, they looked suprised how I could find an error in one glance of code (Strange world Im not a programmer by any means but I do teach it )I would guess that one factor - besides being crusaders on a mission of course - is the repetitiveness of it. As Klumpen alludes to above, more or less this exact thread tends to pop up every 3 months or so, and in the end some of the more temporally advanced board dwellers tend to lose their temper a bit.
Which is a bit unfair to every new person asking the same question, but still. I do get the same urge, sometimes, when I'm grading exams. By the 35th identical error I tend to want to write "I've already told you that is wrong!!! Why do you keep making the same error!!!" It takes great effort to remember that it is actually different students behind every exam