Letalis Sonus
Advanced Member
- Joined
- Mar 5, 2009
- Messages
- 1,532
The OMAP5 has a similar DSP than the OMAP3, albeit less powerful IIRC.Do we have working DSP hardware available?
The OMAP5 has a similar DSP than the OMAP3, albeit less powerful IIRC.Do we have working DSP hardware available?
The only issue I've had with skype feedback is when doing speaker-phone calls; if I put on my headphones the issue goes away. I'm assuming the Pyra might suffer the same, but if you're holding it phone-like the microphone won't be able to hear the speaker so it wouldn't be a problem.Skype in Linux suffers from the same feedback problems.
My wired handset is just a decent clone of a modular type G (works with real Western Electric/Bell hardware, and all parts I swapped worked fine in either the original or the clone). It doesn't have any buttons or other extras added on. The connector on the other end of the cable is the smaller size for older cell fones, so I would need an adaptor, or, since the cable is modular, I could find/make one for smartphones and the Pyra and swap it out. I am pretty sure you can make the same sort of thing with some basic skills and tools and an original WE handset. Due to the size, these handsets aren't really practical except in a stationary location (where you may have a real fone, so just forward to that, but not as fun).That. Is. Awesome. I don't want one, but still - awesome.
I'm still planning to use this for Pyra calls.
Code:https://www.amazon.com/Samsung-Bluetooth-Pocket-Talker-HM5000/dp/B0057WX864
Albeit, it does look a bit goofy to see a big fat guy talking on it. I have used it with my mobile phones and it really does work pretty well. Vibrates and/or beeps on incoming calls too.
Pulseaudio may have some sort of echo cancellation plugin.
but dont get the webrtc module running which seems working better. I think it could be included when building the OS for the pyra.
There is a built on mic so it's possible to do it without a headset, but I suspect the clam shell design would make it awkward/embarrassing to use that way.
I think the best way to use the Pyra as a phone is paired with a headset and a smart watch. Smart watch to get notifications/to answer and a headset for voice.
Lacking the correct term to search for was giving me terrible result... blue tooth handset didn't quite cover it.
Which smartwatch should we get though? Now that the pebble is no more thank to fitbit, it leaves the android phone makers watches alone doesn't it, and those will only talk to android as far as I know. Maybe the standards can be reverse engineered, especially if the relevant bits of android are open source, but I've not heard of any projects to do this yet. I expect licensing will be a problem in actually shipping it with debian say, but there's nothing stopping an end user using it as far as I know.
Which smartwatch should we get though? Now that the pebble is no more thank to fitbit, it leaves the android phone makers watches alone doesn't it, and those will only talk to android as far as I know. Maybe the standards can be reverse engineered, especially if the relevant bits of android are open source, but I've not heard of any projects to do this yet. I expect licensing will be a problem in actually shipping it with debian say, but there's nothing stopping an end user using it as far as I know.
Yeah, I will miss my Pebble time when the battery dies, it already is down to half the life it used to have. Yeah, maybe with that project someone will make a open source pebble type watch. You can't tell me that if someone made a watch that had user replaceable battery that used an open source OS it wouldn't become the most funded project on kickstarter. I think Pebble was just making their watches too nice, smart watches are a niche market to begin with and trying to compete with Google and Apple was too much. There are plenty of people that just want a watch that tells time along with receiving notifications. I know people with iwatches and android watches and think 'why does it need to do all that? Is it really worth the need to charge it once a day?'Maybe this https://asteroidos.org
This is why I think the Pandora as a phone will work for me. I have a job that doesn't require me to voice talk that often, which is beneficial, when things are communicated with text then I can look at the logs and find exactly what I said/what I need to do. With family I really don't talk much in the day, it is text during the day and then I call back at night.. . .not being much of a voice caller. . .
I don't like having things stuck to my wrist, but this would be the type of thing I would want if I could tolerate it strapped to me and wanted it to check messages of whatever. I can't say it would win against a mechanical watch in the useless things I might want competition. Add a light to it somehow, too (that is a function my antique and mechanical watches lack).I had an idea along those lines - a Solar e-ink watch that only updates the display if you tap on it once. I.e. a tiny spring makes contact to tell the watch to update the display. It would have a low power BT radio that only turns on and checks the phone/host if/when the tap happens. No, it would not work for immediate alerts. But - no charger, cable, etc. Maybe have it check for 'alerts' every X minutes?
I have a multi year old Seiko Solar flight chronograph that runs fine off of office lights. I figure that if they can do that for a continuous mechanical movement, the solar tech should be 'good enough' to update a 20mm diameter e-ink screen several times a day.
But yeah - all of these 'watches' that have come out with color screens, constant connections and a constant need to recharge them - it's a bit silly and feature overkill. They're so clunky that they make my Seiko flight watch look svelte.