Gruso said:
Poll options like "I think they slowed down the development after some post-hype intervals" are unfair and untrue.
I'll be honest with you, Gruso. This is actually the main problem I saw during all the project (and the reason for me to start the poll).
Lot's of promising news and sneak peeks for everyone to get hyped, craig and his team are simply masters when it comes to this. Then, a long hopeless period. It is frustrating, more than it is satisfying.
I knew it was going to take long and all, I knew the pre-preorders period had to be this way so people would bet on it... but it's been so many "hype-silence-hype" cycles that I for one am enough of. It's not simply a marketing strategy, it's also a two-edged sword.
paeryn said:
Hmm, I chose yes therefore the checkboxes were not required for my vote, but the board wouldn't let me submit that saying that I had to answer all parts.
I vote for Craig receiving a knighthood if they manage to get the Pandora out by the end of the year! (And ED, MWeston et al receiving whatever their country's equivalent is.)
I wasn't really sure if the board would allow not to vote on an answer for the second question, so the "other reason" (unless explained otherwise, as people are voting and explaining the "other reason") shall be considered a kind of "I said I'm completely satisfied" (which is kinda confusing, lol).
about the "by the end of the year" commentary: that's a big problem, actually. no one benefits from people saying it's ok to give a lot of "it's ok if it takes another 4 or 5 months" votes for them. pressure is also an important factor for projects to succeed. I'm not saying we want a rushed product with flaws, but a product that is actually impressive for the time it's released.
craigix said:
I'm feeling great because this week we should see the first mass production Pandora PCBs.
I'm glad to see the project is coming along. Please take this poll results as a listener, not as a defender.
I believe everyone here wants the best for everyone, everyone's opinion is valid and I sincerely think the next hype cycle won't be harmful if it takes place only when there's only <2 weeks to proper launch ( = shipped first units).